<entry id="2291572" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2831017</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>マンスプレイニング</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>マンスプレーニング</reb>
<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>mansplaining</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2016-12-26 13:37:02" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_refs>wiki</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-12-26 20:55:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>This word is not used in Japanese. The few dozen hits it gets on Google are merely explanations of what the term means.

Literally any non-Japanese word can be written in katakana so a Wikipedia article by itself is not evidence of usage. (Indeed, this article is just a direct translation of the English original).</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-12-27 14:53:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>You make a good point. It gets quite a few hits, but it's always accompanied by an explanation. Could be grounds for rejection. I don't know if there is a policy on what entries are worthy of inclusion. Probably better to reject it not to clutter up the dictionary.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-01-10 04:47:57" stat="R">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Done.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-10-27 11:03:00" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>知恵蔵mini, daijs
included in 小学館's 今年の新語 list last year, 
apparently</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-02-10 23:46:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>マンスプレイニング is in sankoku 8e.
The version with the chōonpu instead of イ is also used in the text of the wiki page. Adding it as a hidden form.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,4 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;マンスプレーニング&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>