<entry id="2287425" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1679980</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>抜け作</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>抜作</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>ヌケ作</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ぬけさく</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ヌケサク</reb>
<re_nokanji/>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&col;</misc>
<misc>&derog;</misc>
<gloss>fool</gloss>
<gloss>dimwit</gloss>
<gloss>blockhead</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2024-01-04 18:26:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>penname01</upd_name>
<upd_refs>smk, shinkoku, iwakoku, nikk, koj

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 抜け作　 │ 3,318 │ 26.7% │
│ ヌケサク │ 4,727 │ 38.0% │
│ 抜作　　 │ 2,216 │ 17.8% │
│ ヌケ作　 │ 2,170 │ 17.5% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7,10 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;抜作&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;ヌケ作&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ヌケサク&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_nokanji/&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -11,0 +22,2 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;sl;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;derog;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-01-04 19:48:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-01-04 21:27:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Although ヌケサク is the most common form, the three kanji forms together account for ~60% of the total n-gram count.
I don't think we should be putting [nokanji] forms first on non-[uk] entries.
Not slang.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, luminous</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+&lt;reb&gt;ぬけさく&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
@@ -17,3 +19,0 @@
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;ぬけさく&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -22 +22 @@
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;sl;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;col;&lt;/misc&gt;
@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;dimwit&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-01-04 21:48:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>stephen</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think we only use the [derog] tag for clarification in entries with glosses that are not obviously derogatory.
E.g. the entry for Ｋ国 ("South Korea").</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;derog;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-01-04 23:26:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We've used [derog] for many words that have "をあざけって" (or something similar) in their definitions, even when the glosses are clearly derogatory. Perhaps it's not necessary but it would need to be discussed.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr: まぬけな人をあざけっていう語。</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2024-01-05 00:26:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, we should discuss the criteria. I'll put it back for now. I'm comfortable with it.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;derog;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>