<entry id="2277744" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1036130</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>オンリー</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>オンリ</reb>
<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&suf;</pos>
<gloss>only</gloss>
<gloss>just</gloss>
<gloss>solely</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&hist;</misc>
<gloss>prostitute attached to a single member of the post-WWII occupation forces</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2016-01-20 04:43:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_refs>gg5 daijr koj</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18,5 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;stagr&gt;オンリー&lt;/stagr&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to the exclusive service of a single member of the Occupation Forces (WW2)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-01-21 22:00:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-23 13:12:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>「日曜オンリーの経済学校」</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>大辞林</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15 +15 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-suf;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-23 20:18:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-23 23:09:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Sense 1 isn't a noun.
I don't think we need オンリイ.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr
G n-grams:
仕事オンリー	3429
仕事オンリ	46
仕事オンリイ	No matches</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,3 +10 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;オンリイ&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
@@ -15 +13 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-suf;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;suf;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -21 +19 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to the exclusive service of a single member of the Occupation Forces (WW2)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to the exclusive service of a single member of the postwar Occupation Forces&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-02-24 02:59:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Trimming.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +19 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to the exclusive service of a single member of the postwar Occupation Forces&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to a single member of the postwar Occupation Forces&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-06-14 13:48:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>I don't think the restr is needed</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +16,0 @@
-&lt;stagr&gt;オンリー&lt;/stagr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-06-14 23:04:55" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Probably not.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-20 04:28:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Remove some (minor) ambiguity for the less historically savvy.  

Maybe there is an argument for capitalizing "Occupation" and/or "Occupation Forces" in some contexts, but it certainly doesn't seem necessary here, and I can't actually find anywhere else we've done this.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>(Just come capitalization examples)

Chapter 3. Japan after World War II
https://www.jica.go.jp/Resource/dsp-chair/english/chair/modernization/ku57pq00002mpdct-att/modernization_chapter_03.pdf
While Japan was pursuing various reforms imposed by the US occupation forces

Google shows this lower-cased more-often-than-not(outside of book/article titles):
"postwar Occupation Forces" japan</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to a single member of the postwar Occupation Forces&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;prostitute attached to a single member of the post-WWII occupation forces&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-20 06:38:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-20 09:20:33" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Is suf really right for sense 1? I don't like it</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;hist;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-20 09:37:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The examples certainly lookas though it's a suffix. In English it's both an adjective and an adverb, not that very relevant here.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 examples:
会社オンリーの人生 a life lived only for the company.
仕事オンリーの人 a person who lives just for his work
これからの流行歌手は歌オンリーではだめだ. Future popular singers won't make the grade just on singing ability.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15,2 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;just for&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;just on&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-20 10:46:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>koj has 「―‐ワン」 as an example but daij both say sth like 名詞の下に付けて...</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-21 21:07:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The "on" in that sentence comes from では. I think "just for" is too context-specific.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;just for&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;just on&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;just&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;solely&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-22 22:37:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>