<entry id="2276103" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1471990</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>俳諧</keb>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf37</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>誹諧</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>はいかい</reb>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf37</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>haikai (collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2098180">俳諧の連歌</xref>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<misc>&hist;</misc>
<gloss>haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&poet;</misc>
<gloss>absurd</gloss>
<gloss>comical</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-08-02 13:22:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>How did all these "humourous" spelling mistakes get in here?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21,1 +21,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;haikai (humourous or vulgar renga poetry) (humorous)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;haikai (humorous or vulgar renga poetry)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-02 18:42:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>they aren't 'spelling mistakes' in all parts of the world</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-08-03 06:20:31" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It is with me. I write "humour" and "humorous".</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-06-01 03:56:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daijs, enwiki
also daijs entry for はい‐ふう【俳風／誹風】, etc:
"俳諧の流儀・風体(ふうてい)。俳句の作風。「蕉門(しょうもん)の―」"</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +19,5 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;haikai&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -21,1 +26,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;haikai (humorous or vulgar renga poetry)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;haikai no renga (humorous or vulgar renga poetry)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-06-06 10:33:07" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think romanizing the full form works very well for sense 2.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -26,1 +26,1 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;haikai no renga (humorous or vulgar renga poetry)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;humorous or vulgar renga poetry&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-01 23:26:03" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,2 +19 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;haikai&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;haikai (collective name for haiku, haibun, haiga, senryū, etc.)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -24,0 +24 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1559370"&gt;連歌&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-02 00:01:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Google N-gram Corpus Counts
| 俳諧　　 | 86,437 | 98.2% |
| 誹諧　　 |  1,611 |  1.8% | &lt;- daijr/s, koj, mk, etc.
| はいかい | 14,614 |  N/A  |</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-02 00:07:27" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-08-20 10:34:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Depending on opinions on my edit to 俳諧の連歌, not sure what you'd actually want to do with [2]. 

Seems [2] should be [hist] (limited to discussion of poetry development). Outside of historical discussion, one would probably assume [1].

I'm not sure [3] is actually archaic. (wiktionary only gives the poetic sense, not in sankoku)  But it's elucidating to have one way or the other. Definitely in daijs as the first entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs defn for 俳諧
https://kotobank.jp/word/%E4%BF%B3%E8%AB%A7-112719
１ こっけい。おかしみ。たわむれ。
２ 俳句（発句ほっく）・連句および俳文などの総称。
３ 「俳諧の連歌」の略。
４ 「俳諧歌はいかいか」の略。

俳諧	86437	98.2%
正統の連歌	0	0.0%  (orthodox renga, used in wikipedia, not common)
俳諧の連歌	590	0.7%
俳諧連歌	993	1.1%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -26 +25,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1559370"&gt;連歌&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -28 +27,8 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;humorous or vulgar renga poetry&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;hist;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;haikai no renga&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;absurd&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;comical&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-02 02:31:27" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Sense 2 needed more; just romaji is useless.
Probably [poet] for sense 3.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -27 +27 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;haikai no renga&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;haikai no renga (humorous, often vulgar style of renga which emerged in the 16th century)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -31 +31 @@
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;poet;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>