<entry id="2276098" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1336820</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>重要</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf01</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>じゅうよう</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf01</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<gloss>important</gloss>
<gloss>essential</gloss>
<gloss>significant</gloss>
<gloss>major</gloss>
<gloss>key</gloss>
<gloss>principal</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-08-29 21:12:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>See for example, 完ぺき [adj-n] and 完ぺきさ[n]
The noun is 重要さ, right?
重要さ	112721

sankoku:形動ダ</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-08-29 23:34:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Although this is almost invariably an adjective, the kokugos (as usual) label it as a noun as well. That's part of the reason we have stuck with "adj-na,n".  I wouldn't really mind dropping the "n" in these cases but I'd like it to be generally agreed among editors and contributors that walking away from the "名・形動" is the best path.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>重要	29761919
重要な	11874488
重要が	3377
重要さ	112721
Daijr: （名・形動）[文]ナリ
Daijs: ［名・形動］</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-08-31 01:43:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In meikyo it's 形動 only. We sometimes drop "n" if one or more of the kokugos has the word as 形動 only and its use as a noun is rare. I think it's OK to do here.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, luminous, wisdom
重要を	1,532	2.8%	
重要さを	52,991	97.2%	
---
の重要が	        584	5.5%	
の重要さが	10,018	94.5%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +18,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;momentous&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -20,0 +20,3 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;significant&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;major&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;key&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -22 +23,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;major&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-09-02 01:29:58" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Thanks. I've tweaked the editorial policy to reflect this.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Part-Of-Speech_(POS)_Issues</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>