<entry id="2237808" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1012350</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>剥れる</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>剝れる</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>むくれる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&v1;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>to become sullen</gloss>
<gloss>to sulk</gloss>
<gloss>to get angry</gloss>
<gloss>to take offense</gloss>
<gloss>to be miffed</gloss>
<gloss>to be upset</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&v1;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>to peel (off)</gloss>
<gloss>to come off</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2019-06-28 06:48:10" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;剝れる&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-05 03:13:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be upset&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-05 04:13:02" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-05 08:18:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>https://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=pout</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -20,0 +21 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to pout&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-05 20:04:22" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not quite the same.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to pout&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-16 15:25:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I see a concerted effort to include "offense" and "offence" in all relevant entries, leading with "offense". Only a handful of entries are missing this.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to take offence&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-16 23:15:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Spelling variations aren't usually necessary if they're unlikely to help with reverse lookups. I think that's the case here.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, luminous, daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to become angry or sullen&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to become sullen&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to sulk&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to get angry&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -19 +20,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to take offence&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -26,2 +27 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to come unstuck from&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to peel off&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to peel (off)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be taken off&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>