<entry id="2230742" stat="A" corpus="jmnedict" type="jmnedict">
<ent_corp type="jmnedict">jmnedict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>5741659</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>森友学園問題</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>もりともがくえんもんだい</reb>
<re_pri>spec1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<misc>&ev;</misc>
<gloss>Moritomo Gakuen scandal (2017)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2018-02-14 06:38:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>probably around 100+ hits the past 24 hrs on twitter 
(didn't count properly)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-17 04:33:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Move to main dict? Seems odd to have it here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-17 05:49:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think having recent political scandals in 
jmdict would be a little weird, at least when 
the scandal isn't really referred to by  
specific word but just a description that's 
not more than the sum of its parts.

Scandals as [ev]ent is a little weird but I 
guess it kind of fits?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +11 @@
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;unclass;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;ev;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-09-17 06:37:07" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm comfortable with it staying here.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-06 01:13:00" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Adding spec1
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+&lt;re_pri&gt;spec1&lt;/re_pri&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>