jmdict
1587660
Active
(id:
2230666)
<entry id="2230666" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1587660</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>嫌味</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>嫌み</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>厭味</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>いや味</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>厭み</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>いやみ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<s_inf>味 is ateji</s_inf>
<gloss>disagreeableness</gloss>
<gloss>unpleasantness</gloss>
<gloss>nastiness</gloss>
<gloss>offensiveness</gloss>
<gloss>tastelessness</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<gloss>cutting remark</gloss>
<gloss>disagreeable remark</gloss>
<gloss>snide comment</gloss>
<gloss>sarcastic comment</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-09-24 04:24:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Gregory Stewart</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,1 +22,1 @@
-<gloss>disagreeableness</gloss>
+<gloss>disagreeability</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-09-25 04:25:02" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>disagreeableness is also in the dictionary.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,0 +22,1 @@
+<gloss>disagreeableness</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-18 05:27:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Joining the dots.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>嫌味 427976
嫌み 87956
厭味 22510
厭み 152
いや味 1261
GG5 and 中辞典 lead with noun glosses.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14,3 @@
+<keb>いや味</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
@@ -19,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&n;</pos>
@@ -21 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&n;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-20 21:14:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Two senses in most of the refs.
We don't need two "disagreeab-" glosses for sense 1. No one is doing an E->J lookup for these words.
The kokugos say that 味 is ateji. Can we tag the whole word as ateji?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog, daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -26,3 +26,12 @@
-<gloss>disagreeability</gloss>
-<gloss>gaudiness</gloss>
-<gloss>sarcasm</gloss>
+<gloss>unpleasantness</gloss>
+<gloss>nastiness</gloss>
+<gloss>offensiveness</gloss>
+<gloss>tastelessness</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
+<gloss>cutting remark</gloss>
+<gloss>disagreeable remark</gloss>
+<gloss>snide comment</gloss>
+<gloss>sarcastic comment</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-21 02:16:47" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-21 18:03:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Ateji tag or a comment?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -24,0 +25 @@
+<s_inf>味 is ateji</s_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-09-21 23:10:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Since it's only a partial ateji this is fine.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-05 05:07:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーー─┬─────────┬───────╮
│ 嫌味 │ 427,976 │ 71.9% │
│ 嫌み │ 87,956 │ 14.8% │
│ 厭味 │ 22,510 │ 3.8% │
│ いや味 │ 1,261 │ 0.2% │ - sK
│ 厭み │ 152 │ 0.0% │ - sK
│ いやみ │ 55,273 │ 9.3% │
╰─ーーー─┴─────────┴───────╯</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-05 05:34:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>