<entry id="2229790" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2099680</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>詮索好き</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>せんさく好き</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>せんさくずき</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<gloss>curiosity</gloss>
<gloss>inquisitiveness</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>nosy person</gloss>
<gloss>busybody</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2006-09-06 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-01 10:46:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Search: 詮索好きな隣人

I still haven't wrapped my head around what exactly happens when you drop が and change すき　to ずき.  I know in principal that you generally gain the ability to use の as a connecting form(where 好き is usually な), but that な also remains common.  This could be because the ずき form is now a noun, and の is how you connect nouns together. (I would think this would support almost all of these entries being [adj-na,adj-no,n]).

It certainly seems like most of these remain [adj-na] whatever the dictionary might otherwise suggest...  We aren't handling these consistently. Here's the first 1/3rd of our entries from an advanced search "ends-with-好き", "ends-with-ずき":
[n] 下手の横好き, 人好き, 子供好き, 客好き
[n,adj-na] 世話好き, 出好き
[n,adj-no] 女好き
[adj-na] 争い好き, お客好き, 交際好き
[adj-na,adj-no] いたずら好き
[n,adj-na,adj-no] きれい好き

These distinctions don't generally seem to be supported by the ngrams.  To take one example of an entry listed currently as [n]:
人好き	61235	  
人好きな	22042	 &lt;- な is 1/3rd of all occurrences
人好きの	5929	  

One more (currently [n,adj-no])
女好き	85862	  
女好きの	14583	  
女好きな	10827	  &lt;- な only marginally less common than の

I'm afraid I don't understand the grammatical nuances well enough to say what *should* be the case, but it is my impression that (at least grammatically speaking) most of the 好き/ずき-suffixed forms should behave the same in most cases.  But our entries are all over the map.

Does anyone have a better understanding here than I do?

We only have about 30 entries of this kind.  I'm willing to print all 30 on a sheet of paper and start surveying Japanese people ;).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>詮索好き	4047	  
詮索好きな	1638	  
詮索好きの	776	  
詮索好きで	452	  
詮索好きな人	211</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14,2 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-na;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-01 22:58:53" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's a noun, and it's the condition not the person.. In cases like this we don't usually add adj-no.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ルミナス (詮索好きは身を誤る  Curiosity killed the cat.), Reverso
Tanaka: 私の隣人はいわゆる詮索好きなのです。 My neighbor is what we call a nosy person.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -15,4 +16,2 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;nosy person&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;busybody&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;curiosity&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;inquisitiveness&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-01 23:22:56" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Most of the kokugo definitions for -好き terms include "また、その人". The original glosses were probably OK.
As for part of speech, some are nouns only, others are 名・形動. Meikyo has 「━の／な 連中」as an example for 酒好き, so adj-no is at least sometimes valid. Needs to be handled case by case.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>詮索好き	        4,047	91.7%	
せんさく好き	364	8.3%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -17,0 +19,5 @@
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;nosy person&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;busybody&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-05-01 23:25:24" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>