<entry id="2229575" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1449320</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>痘瘡</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>痘そう</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>とうそう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1439670">天然痘</xref>
<field>&med;</field>
<gloss>smallpox</gloss>
<gloss>variola</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-04-22 16:45:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This term: 4306
xref: 52606

Wikipedia says: 医学界では一般に痘瘡の語が用いられた。 "*was* commonly used by the medical profession". 

Take this article for example:
https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2021/11/40-42.php

The whole article is on the history of 天然痘, "痘瘡" gets dropped once.

Google news returns a mountain of results for 天然痘, one page for 痘瘡 (including the example above, which is really about 天然痘).

[dated] is just an easy hint that a learner should use the xref (or maybe the [col] 疱瘡, but probably not this term).   Not 100% on how much this is used in modern times.

sankoku says this term is 医学, but says the same of 天然痘</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/天然痘
天然痘（てんねんとう、variola, smallpox）...疱瘡（ほうそう）、痘瘡（とうそう）ともいう
医学界では一般に痘瘡の語が用いられた。

天然痘	52606	62.8%
疱瘡	22856	27.3%
痘瘡	4306	5.1%
痘痕	4018	4.8%

sankoku defn: 医学-&gt;天然痘</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -25,0 +26,3 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1439670"&gt;天然痘・てんねんとう&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;med;&lt;/field&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;dated;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-22 18:16:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We have three different words here. もがさ and おやく are archaic. I suggest dropping both.
とうそう isn't marked as dated in sankoku, meikyo or shinmeikai. I think an x-ref is sufficient.
Brian, please read my comment on 1840080 regarding x-refs.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;御厄&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -12,10 +8,0 @@
-&lt;re_restr&gt;痘瘡&lt;/re_restr&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;もがさ&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_restr&gt;痘瘡&lt;/re_restr&gt;
-&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ok;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;おやく&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ok;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
@@ -25,2 +12 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1439670"&gt;天然痘・てんねんとう&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1439670"&gt;天然痘&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -28 +13,0 @@
-&lt;misc&gt;&amp;dated;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-26 12:04:32" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-26 16:59:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think [dated] might be okay</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>smk5 (1997): 「天然痘」の意の漢語的表現。
smk8 (2020): 「天然痘」の意の古風な表現。</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-26 17:14:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬───────┬───────╮
│ 痘瘡　　　　　 │ 4,306 │ 76.5% │
│ 痘そう　　　　 │ 1,321 │ 23.5% │ - add
│ 痘瘡ワクチン　 │   108 │  N/A  │
│ 痘そうワクチン │   177 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴───────┴───────╯</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;痘そう&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-26 21:31:01" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm not sure. Sankoku 8th ed. (2021) doesn't indicate that it's dated. The 天然痘 entries in the newest editions of daijr and daijs point to 痘瘡.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-28 11:17:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's in GG5 and ルミナス, so I'd avoid [dated].</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>