jmdict
1866290
Active
(id:
2228746)
<entry id="2228746" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1866290</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>金鋸</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>金ノコギリ</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>金のこぎり</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かねのこぎり</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>hacksaw</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-04-13 07:34:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've edited a few other "hacksaw" entries today. I pose this problem to you (which appears in the others as well)
金鋸 3350 25.7%
金ノコ 5900 45.3%
金のこぎり 175 1.3%
金ノコギリ 334 2.6%
The Japanese dictionaries give 金のこぎり as the reading for the kanji. I believe this is correct. In other words, 金鋸 should not be read 金ノコ. I think of this as more of a colloquial (if popular) abbreviation.
In that case, we should have a second entry with the 金ノコ reading, maybe as [abbr].
Or, we consider this to be just-another-reading of the same kanji(鋸 is read ノコ in for some saw types). My gut feeling is that two entries (and maybe an xref) is cleaner. But I honestly don't know.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>金ノコ
https://www.monotaro.com/k/store/%E9%87%91%E3%83%8E%E3%82%B3/
This title covers my other entry "金切りのこぎり" as well, abbreviating as 金ノコ
ダイソーの金切りのこぎり(金ノコ)の切れ具合【100円ショップ】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK7z0gDp_mo
万能タイプの金ノコです
https://zigsow.jp/item/290972/review/271990</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金ノコギリ</keb>
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>金のこぎり</keb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-14 23:23:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Could be sK for 金のこぎり.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>金鋸 3350 86.8%
金のこぎり 175 4.5%
金ノコギリ 334 8.7%</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-16 22:31:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Neither of these forms is common.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -11,0 +13 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>