<entry id="2228610" stat="R" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1866290</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>金鋸</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>金ノコギリ</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>金のこぎり</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かねのこぎり</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>hacksaw</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-04-13 07:34:41" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've edited a few other "hacksaw" entries today. I pose this problem to you (which appears in the others as well)
金鋸	3350	25.7%
金ノコ	5900	45.3%
金のこぎり	175	1.3%
金ノコギリ	334	2.6%

The Japanese dictionaries give 金のこぎり as the reading for the kanji.  I believe this is correct. In other words, 金鋸 should not be read 金ノコ.  I think of this as more of a colloquial (if popular) abbreviation.  

In that case, we should have a second entry with the 金ノコ reading, maybe as [abbr].  

Or, we consider this to be just-another-reading of the same kanji(鋸 is read ノコ in for some saw types). My gut feeling is that two entries (and maybe an xref) is cleaner. But I honestly don't know.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>金ノコ
https://www.monotaro.com/k/store/%E9%87%91%E3%83%8E%E3%82%B3/

This title covers my other entry "金切りのこぎり" as well, abbreviating as 金ノコ
ダイソーの金切りのこぎり（金ノコ）の切れ具合【１００円ショップ】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK7z0gDp_mo

万能タイプの金ノコです
https://zigsow.jp/item/290972/review/271990</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,6 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;金ノコギリ&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;金のこぎり&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-14 23:22:36" stat="R">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Seems to be a fork.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>