<entry id="2227668" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2038090</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>頬染める</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ほおそめる</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ほほそめる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&v1;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1908200">頬を染める</xref>
<gloss>to blush</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2005-05-01 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-01 07:52:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Open question... do these two terms actually have different reading requirements on 頬: ほお・ほほ.  If either of these terms would prefer ほほ, you'd think it would be hoooo  ほおを...染める, but that entry is ほお.  Would a Japanese person distinguish these if reading today?  I may ask around later, but even that may not give a good answer.

It *seems* like this entry should probably have a ほおそめる reading, and the xref should probably have a ほほをそめる reading. Looks like a lot of 頬 entries probably merit both readings, but in this case it's particularly odd two have to apparently-related forms with different readings...

ほほをそめる	33
ほほそめる	38
ほほを染める	205
ほほ染める	137

ほおを染める	0
ほおをそめる	0
ほおそめる	0
ほお染める	0</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>頬を染める	7221	83.8%
頬染める	1396	16.2%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1908200"&gt;頬を染める・ほおをそめる&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-01 08:06:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Searched twitter, all forms represented with photos.  I don't know by what logic one would order ほおそめる and ほほそめる. Clearly "ほお" is the "modern" form, maybe the whole expression is a little dated though?  I would be cautious of ordering differently between 頬を染める and 頬染める if there isn't some very compelling reason...

If anything ほほ seems more prevalant when spelled out, but perhaps that's because it is the exception to the rule, and 頬染める would usually be read ほお.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://twitter.com/search?q=%22%E3%81%BB%E3%81%BB%E6%9F%93%E3%82%81%E3%81%A6%22</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ほおそめる&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-01 10:06:30" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree ほお is more likely. Very hard to confirm.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-02 21:08:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This is just 頬を染める without the を. It's not in the refs. I don't think it's needed.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-02 21:49:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>True, but it gives the text glossers a chance to produce something useful. 頬+染める is a bit messy.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>頬染める	1396
頬染めて	3710</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-04-02 21:59:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;exp;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -15 +16 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1908200"&gt;頬を染める・ほおをそめる&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1908200"&gt;頬を染める&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>