<entry id="2226815" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1564580</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>はさみ切る</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>挟み切る</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>剪み切る</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>はさみきる</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&v5r;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<misc>&rare;</misc>
<gloss>to snip (off)</gloss>
<gloss>to nip off</gloss>
<gloss>to clip off</gloss>
<gloss>to trim off</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-11-10 10:55:28" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>剪み切る	0	0.0% &lt; GG5
挟み切る	79	18.0% &lt;- ルミナス
はさみきる	0	0.0%
はさみ切る	361	82.0% &lt;- Unidic, ルミナス example</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;剪み切る&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;はさみ切る&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -8,0 +9,4 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;剪み切る&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-11 10:33:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to snip (off)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -21,2 +22 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to snip&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to clip&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to clip off&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-29 14:21:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>So 剪み is an old/alt form of 鋏　(with 金 radical), and. 鋏む・剪む already means "to clip with scissors". So what is 剪み切る supposed to mean... I find the whole thing quite suspicious, but I guess [sK] is good enough (no ngrams, scant online evidence).

This is one of these scenarios where a "word" seems to exist only because Japanese people like to drop their particles. We don't *have* to mention that this "verb" is a rare formulation of a super-common construction はさみで切る (which で ), but it seems like it would be a nice thing to do...

not in sankoku in any form.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>剪み切る no matches

ハサミで切る	9068	59.2%
はさみで切る	5730	37.4%


剪み切って	No matches
剪みで切って	No matches
挟み切って	0	0.0%
はさみ切って	55	0.2%
ハサミ切って	30	0.1%
挟みで切って	124	0.4%
はさみで切って	13763	41.6%
ハサミで切って	19113	57.8%

はさみ切る	361	2.4%
ハサミ切る	39	0.3%
挟みで切る	32	0.2%
挟み切る	79	0.5%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +20,2 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;rare;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;shortened form of the common はさみで切る&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-29 14:25:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Forgot [sK]</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-29 14:26:52" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>(sorry for the double-post, the whole intention was to keep my edit, and secondarily vote to delete)

ルミネ and GG5 notwithstanding, if there isn't other evidence that this is a "word", I don't think we want to treat every occurrence of a dropped を、で、が、の etc. as a "word" (especially when rare). 

Perhaps I have misread/mis-researched this term, but this is what it appears to me to be.

If it stays, I stand by my suggestion that this have a [note] giving the common form (not sure of the optimal wording).  We can't xref, because ハサミで切る would never pass an obviousness test(nor do I think it should).</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-29 20:06:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Welcome to the interesting world of 複合動詞. Yes, it's rare but there is no evidence it's an abbreviation of はさみで切る.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +20,0 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;shortened form of the common はさみで切る&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-29 20:09:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>剪み切る is in daijr, koj, gg5, and mentioned in shinmeikai</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-29 20:13:31" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Thanks. I meant to remove that.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>