<entry id="2225979" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1116090</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>プリフィックス</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>プリフィクス</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<lsource xml:lang="fre"/>
<gloss>prix fixe</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-03-21 02:45:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Our entries for プレフィックス and プレフィクス should probably be merged.
Maybe プリフィックス can be added there.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr has プリフィックス as the English "prefix" and プリフィクス as the French "prix fixe"

Daijs has プリフィクス as "prix fixe" and says 「プリフィックス」とも. Its entry for プリフィックス says "prefix" but redirects to プレフィックス (note: レ instead of リ)

Sankoku has both プリフィックス and プリフィクス as "prix fixe" and doesn't mention "prefix."

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーーーーー─┬────────┬───────╮
│ プリフィックス │ 14,918 │ 53.5% │ - add
│ プリフィクス　 │ 12,951 │ 46.5% │
│ プレフィックス │ 36,448 │  N/A  │
│ プレフィクス　 │  4,849 │  N/A  │
╰─ーーーーーーー─┴────────┴───────╯</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;プリフィックス&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -9 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;prefix&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;lsource xml:lang="fre"/&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;prix fixe&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-21 04:10:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, the Japanese references are all over the place.
We need to split "prix fixe"  and "prefix" on the source term. I propose basing our entries on the プリ/プレ difference and having the other forms as [sk]. It's taking the high ground a bit, the alternatives are very messy.
(We could have second senses with xrefs in the two プリ/プレ entries. Would that help?)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>KOD (as an example: プリフィ(ッ)クス
1 【文法】 〔接頭辞〕 a prefix (略: pref.).
2 〔フランス料理で値段が均一のコース料理･定食〕 a prix fixe 
Koj: プレフィックス【prefix】
接頭辞。↔サフィックス</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9,8 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;プレフィックス&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;プレフィクス&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-21 04:22:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>None of the references seem to have "prix fixe" for the プレ* forms, so I don't think any hidden forms are needed on this entry at least.

Judging by sankoku's entry and the wikipedia article above, I suspect that the プリ* forms are pretty marginal for "prefix." I'd say it's probably okay to keep them hidden on that entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%8E%A5%E9%A0%AD%E8%BE%9E</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,8 +8,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;プレフィックス&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;プレフィクス&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-21 11:28:58" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK. I guess the nakaguro form (which I've seen in the wild) is not really common enough to bother with.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>プリ・フィックス	96</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>