<entry id="2225644" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1279830</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>構文</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>こうぶん</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>sentence structure</gloss>
<gloss>grammatical construction</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&comp;</field>
<gloss>syntax</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-10-16 07:05:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Silja Ijas</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The term 構文 for 'construction' is especially used in construction grammar (eg. http://user.keio.ac.jp/~rhotta/hellog/2014-09-11-1.html). 
Also the example sentence linked to this entry demonstrates this English meaning.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;construction&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-16 11:12:01" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Correct but it needs a bit of context.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;construction&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;grammatical construction&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-10-16 12:35:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"syntax" is 構文論.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, meikyo</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,3 +11,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-no;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;field&gt;&amp;ling;&lt;/field&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;syntax&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-17 06:25:55" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>"Syntax" should probably be added back to sense 1. Sources seem to translate "syntax" as 構文(論).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://developer.mozilla.org/ja/docs/Glossary/Syntax
https://e-words.jp/w/%E3%82%B7%E3%83%B3%E3%82%BF%E3%83%83%E3%82%AF%E3%82%B9.html</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;ling;&lt;/field&gt;
@@ -13,0 +15,5 @@
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;field&gt;&amp;comp;&lt;/field&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;syntax&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-17 22:14:44" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it's best this way, keeping syntax with 構文法/構文論.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-19 00:52:27" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>GG5 doesn't tag sense 1 as a linguistics term.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-&lt;field&gt;&amp;ling;&lt;/field&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>