jmdict
1409800
Active
(id:
2224686)
<entry id="2224686" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1409800</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>対</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>對</keb>
<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>たい</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>versus</gloss>
<gloss>against</gloss>
<gloss>vs.</gloss>
<gloss>v.</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<s_inf>used between numbers</s_inf>
<gloss>to (e.g. score of 4 to 2, ratio of 3 to 1, vote of 320 to 180)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
<gloss>toward ...</gloss>
<gloss>to ...</gloss>
<gloss>with ...</gloss>
<gloss>against ...</gloss>
<gloss>anti-</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>equal footing</gloss>
<gloss>equal terms</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>opposite</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-10-01 03:25:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,1 +22,2 @@
-<gloss>vs</gloss>
+<gloss>vs.</gloss>
+<gloss>v.</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-01-09 13:49:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to (i.e. "we won the game five to three")</gloss>
+<gloss>to (e.g. "we won the game five to three")</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-01-11 04:29:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>it's a little odd including an entire example sentence in
the gloss, isn't it?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-01-13 07:27:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>it's tough without it. "five to three" could indicate the time, which would be wrong</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -28 +28 @@
-<gloss>to (e.g. "we won the game five to three")</gloss>
+<gloss>to (e.g. "winning a game five to three")</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-12-30 16:11:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Daru</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E5%B0%8D</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7,4 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>對</keb>
+<ke_inf>&oK;</ke_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-12-30 20:30:49" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-14 00:43:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think this is a better sense ordering.
I'll reindex the sentences if this is approved.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog, daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,7 +17,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<gloss>opposite</gloss>
-<gloss>opposition</gloss>
-</sense>
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -25,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>against</gloss>
@@ -31,2 +25,10 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<gloss>to (e.g. "winning a game five to three")</gloss>
+<s_inf>used between numbers</s_inf>
+<gloss>to (e.g. score of 4 to 2, ratio of 3 to 1, vote of 320 to 180)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n-pref;</pos>
+<gloss>toward ...</gloss>
+<gloss>to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>with ...</gloss>
+<gloss>against ...</gloss>
+<gloss>anti-</gloss>
@@ -36 +37,0 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
@@ -42,5 +43 @@
-<pos>&conj;</pos>
-<gloss>against ...</gloss>
-<gloss>anti-</gloss>
-<gloss>toward ...</gloss>
-<gloss>to ...</gloss>
+<gloss>opposite</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-14 06:14:15" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-14 20:52:12" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Done.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>