<entry id="2224508" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2830836</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>どう考えても</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>どうかんがえても</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<gloss>no matter how you look at it</gloss>
<gloss>no matter how you slice it</gloss>
<gloss>clearly</gloss>
<gloss>obviously</gloss>
<gloss>surely</gloss>
<gloss>without a doubt</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2016-12-17 14:42:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>http://eow.alc.co.jp/search?q=%E3%81%A9%E3%81%86%E8%80%83%E3%81%88%E3%81%A6%E3%82%82
http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/%E3%81%A9%E3%81%86%E8%80%83%E3%81%88%E3%81%A6%E3%82%82</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-12-17 15:08:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how one looks at it&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-12-18 01:27:58" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>GG5 examples.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;in all probability&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-09 02:23:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>are this and どう見ても adv?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-09 23:30:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Some of our 〜ても expressions are tagged as adv, others are not. It would be good to decide on a policy. The kokugos typically treat them as expressions (連語) only, but they don't always agree. Personally, I wouldn't consider this an adverb.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-05-10 06:06:44" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We have around 50 〜ても entries and most are just "exp". Some, such as またしても, are just "adv", and some are "exp,adv". I doubt we can address these at a policy level as the usages seem to differ a lot. I think it will have to be a case-by-case assessment. (Daijisen tags またしても as 副.)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-10 09:02:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>less stilted, in line with the どう見ても entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,2 +16,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how one slices it&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how one looks at it&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how you slice it&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how you look at it&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-10 21:59:03" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-12 11:22:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think these glosses should lead.
I don't think "in all probability" is a great gloss.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12,4 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how you look at it&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how you slice it&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;clearly&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;obviously&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -13 +16,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;clearly&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -15,3 +17,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;in all probability&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how you slice it&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;no matter how you look at it&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-03-12 21:02:51" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, better.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>