<entry id="2222707" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1591960</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>極まる</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf45</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>窮まる</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>谷まる</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>きわまる</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf45</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&v5r;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>to reach an extreme</gloss>
<gloss>to reach a limit</gloss>
<gloss>to terminate</gloss>
<gloss>to come to an end</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&aux-v;</pos>
<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
<pos>&v5r;</pos>
<s_inf>after adjectival noun. e.g. 退屈極まる話</s_inf>
<gloss>extremely</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&v5r;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<s_inf>esp. 窮まる. occ. 谷まる</s_inf>
<gloss>to be stuck</gloss>
<gloss>to be in a dilemma</gloss>
<gloss>to be at a loss</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&v5r;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>to be decided</gloss>
<gloss>to be settled</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-04-11 23:28:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Daijr</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +12,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;谷まる&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-04-12 01:25:36" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-12-12 15:29:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Added some more senses from Daijr/s (but kept similar ones combined).

Probably shouldn't should give an adverb gloss for a verb (sense 2) but I can't think of any other way to do it.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr, Daijs</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -24,0 +25,2 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to reach an extreme&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to reach a limit&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -26,2 +28,13 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to reach an extreme&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to take to the extreme&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to come to an end&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;aux-v;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v5r;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;after adjectival noun. e.g. 退屈極まる話&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;extremely&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v5r;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;esp. 窮まる. occ. 谷まる&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be stuck&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29 +42,6 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be at an end&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v5r;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be decided&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be settled&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-12-21 01:34:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>GG5, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -41,0 +42 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be at a loss&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-14 16:03:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>should sense two have an adj-f tag for pos/gloss agreement? or is aux-v enough?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-17 02:23:13" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"adj-f" won't hurt.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -31,0 +32 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-f;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-24 12:39:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brian Krznarich</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm fine with [rK] in spite of the statistics - it is "correct" -  but whatever you decide.  Note: statistics for 極 and 谷 should probably not be directly compared, as they are not generally considered interchangeable in correct usage. (谷 = 窮 only, it seems).  There are modern examples of 谷まる in yourei, it appears here and there online, but is indeed rare.

If we [sK]  谷まる, I think all instances of　谷まる should be [sK] across all entries, including 進退極まる and 進退これ谷まる.  If 谷 is removed from 進退これ谷まる, that entry should probably just be deleted.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>極まって	16379	75.9%
きわまって	3075	14.2%
窮まって	2110	9.8%
谷まって	27	0.1%

Hah: Twitter handle = 進退これ谷まる
https://twitter.com/shintaikiwamaru</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-24 22:26:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>&gt;&gt; If we [sK]  谷まる, I think all instances of　谷まる should be [sK] across all entries,
Those entries can be handled as individual cases. Here 谷まる gets tiny n-gram counts and seems not to be in any kokugo (the usual criterion for [rK]).</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15 +15 @@
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;sK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>