<entry id="2222452" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1031670</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>オースティン</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>オースチン</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>Austin (US)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-02-20 11:13:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;オースチンと緑が一緒に住むかも？&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-20 16:13:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>Was there any reason for changing the kanji to that? No references were provided, and it doesn't seem very justified. I think it should be reverted.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-20 19:39:09" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Ridiculous edit. Both オースチン and オースティン are in the names dictionary.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-20 20:47:48" stat="D">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-20 23:02:58" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Austin is a state capital, though. I think it qualifies for inclusion.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-20 23:13:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>True</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,3 +4,3 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;オースチンと緑が一緒に住むかも？&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;オースティン&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -10,3 +9,0 @@
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;オースティン&lt;/reb&gt;
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
@@ -15 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Austin&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Austin (Texas, USA)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-21 02:23:59" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"(US)" is used in 40 entries, "(USA)" in 14. They should be aligned. I prefer "US". We don't mention the state on any US city entries, as far as I know.
The editorial policy on proper names in JMdict was tweaked about a year ago to add "(if significant)" to the "states and provinces of English-speaking countries and their capital cities" category. (See the discussion on 1077200.)
Austin is one of the larger US state capitals but I'm not sure it's needed here.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Austin (Texas, USA)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Austin (US)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-21 03:02:57" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Thanks for reminding me. If we're not including all US state capitals, this can go.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-21 20:33:26" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Wiki tells me Austin is the 11th-most-populous city in the United States. The only state capital with a larger population than Austin on that list is New York City. Population isn't everything but if Austin is not considered a "significant" state capital then we should probably not bother mentioning "capital cities" of Anglosphere states and provinces in policy at all.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-21 20:53:47" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I guess if it's bigger than Sacramento (#2853293) it can stay.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>