<entry id="2222389" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2857457</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>英彦</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>えいげん</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>outstanding man</gloss>
<gloss>prodigy</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2023-02-20 06:55:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_detl>英彦	69957
Also a given name.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://kotobank.jp/word/%E8%8B%B1%E5%BD%A6-2012785</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-20 14:45:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I suspect that almost all those n-grams are names. Nikk is the only kokugo that has this. I don't think it's needed.
If a word is in none of the usual refs besides nikkoku, it's usually archaic or obsolete. A submission that cites nikk should ideally be supported by other references or evidence of non-archaic use.
Jim, could we add a note about nikk to the editorial policy?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-02-21 02:25:33" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've added a few words to the policy. I agree that Nikkoku alone is not a great case.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.edrdg.org/wiki/index.php/Editorial_policy#Which_Reference_Is_Best%3F
Unidic only has 英彦 for the names ひでひこ and ひこ.</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>