<entry id="2218940" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1261020</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>元年</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf09</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>がんねん</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf09</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>first year (of an imperial era)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>year something (important) first happened or began</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2019-04-26 21:25:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>平成 etc. are more commonly referred to as 
"eras"</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of a specific reign)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of a specific era)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-28 00:40:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-28 08:59:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Shouldn't this just be "n"? Is it really n-adv?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17,4 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of a specific era)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an imperial era)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;n-adv,n-t] the year something (important) first happened or began&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-04-29 02:08:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>These need regularizing/simplifying.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,2 +15 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-t;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -20 +19,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;n-adv,n-t] the year something (important) first happened or began&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;year something (important) first happened or began&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-01-12 11:10:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Kyle Ong</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>added definition</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E5%85%83%E5%B9%B4/#jn-49386</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +16,5 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an imperial era)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an emperor's reign)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an era, e.g. Heisei, Reiwa)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-01-12 21:23:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Daijs does split, but its 1 and 2 seem to mean much the same thing to me. OK so during the Edo period and earlier there were eras whose start didn't coincide with the reign of a new emperor, but I don't think that's super relevant here. 
We refer to 元号 as "imperial era" pretty consistently across plenty of entries here. If the concept needs to be explained/have examples, it would be better to just xref to the gengo entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,5 +16 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an emperor's reign)&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an era, e.g. Heisei, Reiwa)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;first year (of an imperial era)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2023-01-13 21:05:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>