<entry id="2217595" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2281510</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>アルファベット表記法</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>アルファベットひょうきほう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&comp;</field>
<gloss>alphabetical notation</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2008-05-24 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-11 10:42:52" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>アルファベット表記法	63</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-19 22:52:35" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>There are about 25 entries of the XXX表記法 structure, virtually all of which came from the 2008 incorporation of a computing glossary. From checking a sample of them I see many are even less common than this one. We need a consistent approach to them.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-21 01:45:39" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We'd need to go through them one by one to check whether they're valid. I suspect that at least of a few of them are much more commonly known by other names. For example, none of the four "Polish notation" or "reverse Polish notation" entries are in common use. They can probably all be deleted.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>プレフィックス表記法	0
ポーランド表記法	        132
ルカーシェビッチ表記法	0
前置表記法	        0
------------------
ポーランド記法	        4205

ポストフィックス表記法	0
後置表記法	        96
逆ポーランド表記法	        115
------------------
逆ポーランド記法	        3542</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-31 20:57:37" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've made a note to work on these notation entries. Yes, many need stripping out. I'll drop this one for now.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>