jmdict
1561990
Active
(id:
2215728)
<entry id="2215728" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1561990</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>和音</keb>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf35</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>わおん</reb>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf35</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&music;</field>
<gloss>chord</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1932300">慣用音</xref>
<gloss>customary "on" reading (of a kanji) used in Japanese (as opposed to those derived from Chinese)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1269180">呉音</xref>
<xref type="see" seq="1213140">漢音</xref>
<misc>&arch;</misc>
<s_inf>Heian-period term</s_inf>
<gloss>Wu reading (of a kanji; as opposed to a Han reading)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-11-29 04:41:05" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>chord (music)</gloss>
+<field>&music;</field>
+<gloss>chord</gloss>
@@ -22 +23 @@
-<gloss>(Japanese) On reading</gloss>
+<gloss>(Japanese) on reading</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-28 01:02:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -23 +23 @@
-<gloss>(Japanese) on reading</gloss>
+<gloss>"on" reading of a kanji</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-06-28 09:04:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I can't see "Japanese music" in the refs. Can we drop that sense?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -27 +24,0 @@
-<pos>&adj-no;</pos></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-07-08 00:38:47" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>An abbreviation of 和音楽 seems plausible, but I can't confirm it.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,4 +22,0 @@
-<sense>
-<pos>&n;</pos>
-<gloss>Japanese music</gloss>
-</sense></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-13 16:23:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21 @@
-<gloss>"on" reading of a kanji</gloss>
+<gloss>"kun" reading of a kanji</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-13 21:55:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think this is what it referred to. No evidence it's used for 訓読み.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Koj, Daijr/s.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%92%8C%E9%9F%B3 - "漢字の音読みのうち中国での発音に対応しない音については「慣用音」を、古代に漢音(からごえ)に対して和音(やまとごえ・わおん)と呼んだ音については「呉音」をご覧ください。 "</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -21 +21,4 @@
-<gloss>"kun" reading of a kanji</gloss>
+<xref type="see" seq="1269180">呉音・ごおん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1213140">漢音・かんおん</xref>
+<misc>&arch;</misc>
+<gloss>Japanese reading of a kanji (covered both the Han and Wu "on" readings)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-13 23:39:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Indeed, it doesn't refer to kun readings. But nor does it refer to Han readings.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr: 日本流の漢字音。平安時代には,漢音を正音とするのに対して,呉音系をいう。また,漢音・呉音などに対して,日本的に変化した音である慣用音をいうこともある。
meikyo: 漢音・呉音などに対して、日本流に変化した漢字の慣用音。◇平安時代には正音とされた漢音に対して呉音系の音をいった。</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -21,2 +21,7 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1269180">呉音・ごおん</xref>
-<xref type="see" seq="1213140">漢音・かんおん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1932300">慣用音</xref>
+<gloss>customary "on" reading (of a kanji) used in Japanese (as opposed to those derived from Chinese)</gloss>
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1269180">呉音</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="1213140">漢音</xref>
@@ -24 +29,2 @@
-<gloss>Japanese reading of a kanji (covered both the Han and Wu "on" readings)</gloss>
+<s_inf>Heian-period term</s_inf>
+<gloss>Wu reading (of a kanji; as opposed to a Han reading)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-14 03:32:23" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I did wonder about a split like that, but thought we could get away with one reading sense. I think this works well.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>