<entry id="2215236" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2856904</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>ミミズ千匹</keb>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>ミミズ１０００匹</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ミミズせんびき</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<misc>&vulg;</misc>
<misc>&sl;</misc>
<gloss>thousand earthworms (as a description for a vagina that has many folds and provides extraordinary pleasure during intercourse)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-11-30 11:41:15" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nicolas Maia</upd_name>
<upd_refs>https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%9F%E3%83%9F%E3%82%BA%E5%8D%83%E5%8C%B9
https://www.reddit.com/r/japanlife/comments/z7vnni/comment/iyankfx/?utm_source=reddit&amp;utm_medium=web2x&amp;context=3</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-02 16:42:28" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Isn't this more of a description than a noun? I'm not sure it belongs in a dictionary.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-05 00:59:09" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Much as I dislike it, it's common enough to include; sans value judgements.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ミミズ千匹	946</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;really good pussy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;active female genitalia&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-05 12:25:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>I have no idea what "active female genitalia" is supposed to mean. I think it's an exceedingly bad gloss for a vulgar slang word.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-05 23:59:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm not yet convinced this is needed. Wikipedia describes it as a "...女性器を形容する言葉".</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-06 13:21:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>I think it should be kept, but the gloss needs to be understandable which it currently is not.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-08 10:54:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it should stay, but getting a succinct gloss is a challenge. I had problems with the first version - once I realized it didn't refer to a cat I thought it meant the visual appearance of someone's pudenda. Reading the Wikipedia entry gives a clearer but rather wordy explanation. I've tried to summarise Jitsuyou's version.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.weblio.jp/content/%E3%83%9F%E3%83%9F%E3%82%BA%E5%8D%83%E5%8C%B9 - 膣内の襞の数が夥しくて、よく動くさまを指す表現。いわゆる名器の一つとされる。</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;active female genitalia&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;vagina with many folds and significant movement during intercourse&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-08 23:59:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it needs to be glossed like this.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;vagina with many folds and significant movement during intercourse&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;thousand earthworms (as a description for a vagina that has many folds and provides extraordinary pleasure during intercourse)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-09 01:18:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I was going to say "quite a mouthful", but I won't.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>