jmdict
2029720
Active
(id:
2215004)
<entry id="2215004" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2029720</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>イ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2099720">いろは順</xref>
<gloss>1st (in a sequence denoted by the iroha system)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&music;</field>
<s_inf>used mainly in key names</s_inf>
<gloss>A (note)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2005-03-05 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-22 06:35:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Proposing to align the rest of the iroha entries with the ト entry, for which we split senses a few years ago. If approved I'll do the other 5.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +9 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2099720">伊呂波順・いろはじゅん</xref>
@@ -9,0 +11,4 @@
+</sense>
+<sense>
+<pos>&n;</pos>
+<field>&music;</field>
@@ -10,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>A</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-24 23:52:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The description for sense 2 is incorrect. There's no single "diatonic scale". Notes are usually defined using C major, in which case "A" would be the 6th note, not the 1st. I don't think it's necessary to give a definition here.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_(musical_note)
伊呂波順 37
いろは順 2231
イロハ順 1128</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +9 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="2099720">伊呂波順・いろはじゅん</xref>
+<xref type="see" seq="2099720">いろは順</xref>
@@ -15,2 +15,2 @@
-<gloss>1st note in the diatonic scale (used in key names, etc.)</gloss>
-<gloss>A</gloss>
+<s_inf>used mainly in key names</s_inf>
+<gloss>A (note)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-25 07:35:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, the "diatonic scale" is a bit off the mark. Strictly we should probably say "names of key signatures", but it's getting wordy.
I'll align the others.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-12-05 01:38:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Aligning.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10 +10 @@
-<gloss>1st in a sequence denoted by the iroha system</gloss>
+<gloss>1st (in a sequence denoted by the iroha system)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>