<entry id="2213597" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2068730</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>置きなさい</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>おきなさい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1421850">置く・おく・1</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<s_inf>imperative</s_inf>
<gloss>put</gloss>
<gloss>place</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1421850">置く・おく・2</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<s_inf>imperative</s_inf>
<gloss>leave</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1421850">置く・おく・9</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<s_inf>imperative; after -te form of verb</s_inf>
<gloss>do (in preparation)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2005-12-22 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-09-02 11:49:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Redoing xrefs.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・1&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・2&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -21,0 +24 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・9&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-22 18:42:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Just a regular 置き + なさい compound.
Needed?
(On the other hand there are 96 tagged examples of 置きなさい in the Tanaka corpus)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-22 21:17:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>How bizarre. I'm for deleting it.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-23 00:05:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Need to hold off as Tatoeba is down and I can't fix the indices.
The term probably came from material used in a Japanese course. I feel that it's probably useful to keep as it's something learners may find useful.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -19,0 +20 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;
@@ -24,0 +26 @@
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;uk;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-07-11 08:06:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>If Jim thinks it's probably useful to keep ...</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-02-22 03:28:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +14,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;put (imperative form)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;imperative&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;put&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -21 +22,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;leave (imperative form)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;imperative&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;leave&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -27 +29,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;do (in preparation) (imperative form, after -te form of verb)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;imperative; after -te form of verb&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;do (in preparation)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-13 12:40:14" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I still don't think this is needed. We don't have any other -なさい entries that aren't set expressions.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・1&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -22 +20,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・2&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -29 +26,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・9&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-14 00:17:05" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-14 00:18:38" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Hmm. All 96 examples are sense 3. I'm coming around to the view it's not really worth having. I'll drop it.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>