<entry id="2213444" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1009580</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>して置く</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>しておく</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&v5k;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1421850">置く・おく・10</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<s_inf>usu. ,,,にしておく, etc.</s_inf>
<gloss>to leave as</gloss>
<gloss>to view as</gloss>
<gloss>to maintain the status quo</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-09-13 04:46:14" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added additional PoS via batch update.Added additional PoS via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +12,1 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v5k;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-09-13 14:11:18" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brandon Kentel</upd_name>
<upd_detl>aux? this can't really be used on its own as it is. Also, the original gloss seems a bit iffy though I can see how it might have been translated as such.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +13,2 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;aux;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2153300"&gt;にする&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -15,0 +17,2 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to leave as&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to view as&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-09-13 20:23:09" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i don't think you can call something like this an [aux].  i think that's like だ or な
り or something verb-like that can't take a verb PoS.  is there a particular sense 
of にする you wanted to link to?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,1 +13,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;aux;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -16,1 +15,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;maintain status-quo&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -19,0 +17,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to maintain the status quo&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-09-14 01:26:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Brandon Kentel</upd_name>
<upd_detl>they're probably all applicable really</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-09-17 04:27:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-05 03:15:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_detl>this entry feels a bit incomplete, like it was meant to be 
"そのままにしておく" or just "しておく"... but if it's the latter, 
wouldn't a better gloss be "to take care of; to do in 
advance"... or something along those lines?
neither is in any other dics I can find but daijs has 
し‐お・く【▽為置く／仕置く】
１ 処置する。しておく。</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>eij example sentences ("して置く")</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-06 05:52:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think so. I have just looked through the instances of にしておく in the GG5 examples and in Eijiro. They pretty much match what is here. Yes, something like そのままにしておく is very typical usage.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-10-16 06:08:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I really can't see how this relates to the current にする entry. Certainly not to all 5 senses.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,4 +12,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="2153300"&gt;にする・1&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="2153300"&gt;にする・2&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="2153300"&gt;にする・3&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="2153300"&gt;にする・4&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2015-10-22 05:34:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-05 23:59:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think this should be an entry. The pattern is AをBにしておく. "にしておく" itself is not an expression. The に is a particle but this entry gives the impression that it's part of the verb.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-07 01:13:33" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I take the point about the に. I think it's worth mentioning, though. Maybe this works.
The original is indexed in 40 sentences. I'll reindex to this version if the edit is accepted.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>中辞典: sense #15 of its 置く entry:
《「…しておく」の形で》
¶(そのままに)しておく leave a thing as it is; let a thing alone [be]
にしておく	834818
にしておきます	374855
にしておいた	188102
にしておいて	363867</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;keb&gt;にして置く&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;して置く&lt;/keb&gt;
@@ -8 +8 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;にしておく&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;しておく&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1421850"&gt;置く・おく・10&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+&lt;s_inf&gt;usu. ,,,にしておく, etc.&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-08 00:31:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I still don't think it's needed. As an auxiliary verb, おく can be used with all sorts of verbs. する is just one example.
If we have this, we'd need to add the other auxiliary verb senses as well. Daijs has 2, GG5 has 3, Daijr has 5.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-11 05:46:14" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>On reflection, I agree it's probably better to clean up the indexing of the examples for 置く・おく.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>