<entry id="2213017" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2597990</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ムッと</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>むっと</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>むーっと</reb>
<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>むうっと</reb>
<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
<gloss>to be offended</gloss>
<gloss>to get angry</gloss>
<gloss>to be annoyed</gloss>
<gloss>to be miffed</gloss>
<gloss>to be huffy</gloss>
<gloss>to be sullen</gloss>
<gloss>to be upset</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
<gloss>to be stuffy</gloss>
<gloss>to be stifling</gloss>
<gloss>to be muggy</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<misc>&on-mim;</misc>
<gloss>firmly (shutting one's mouth)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2010-11-29 05:16:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>new entry from a split</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>koj, daij, nikk</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2010-11-30 07:30:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-06-29 04:07:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Often see as ムッと.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,0 +10,3 @@
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ムッと&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-06-29 04:27:27" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-24 00:44:33" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Given that this is usually [vs], adjective glosses make more sense.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog, googits</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9 +9 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;むうっと&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ムッと&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -12 +12,4 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;ムッと&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;むーっと&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;むうっと&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -18,7 +21,6 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;むうっと is more emphatic&lt;/s_inf&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;sullenly&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;angrily&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;testily&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;huffily&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;petulantly&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;indignantly&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;むーっと is more emphatic&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;sullen&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;offended&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;petulant&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;indignant&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -30,2 +32,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;stuffily&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;stiflingly&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;stuffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;stifling&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-28 23:47:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>i don't think that's generally consistent with what we've done (and also that it's weird to have an adverb glossed as an adjective).  suggest reverting</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-29 03:02:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We've done it plenty of times. (A few examples: ゆったり, ほっこり, がっくり, がっちり, しっとり)

No point in forcing in awkward adverb glosses when the word effectively functions as an adjective anyway.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-30 20:03:22" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Robin is right that we have been inconsistent,
but our goal is to have matching PoS.
The glosses
    sullenly; offendedly; huffily; petulantly; indignantly
    stuffily; stiflingly;
are at least tolerable.
I lean towards Rene's position here,
but would be willing to go either way.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-30 20:12:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>aah, I didn't see Robin's comment that this entry is usually [vs]
Robin, you should have changed the PoS to [vs,adv].
If that's so, then I think adjective glosses are best.
(We usually gloss [vs] with nouns, but that would be too contrived here.)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-31 07:08:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>gg5 only has むっとする, 3 of 4 examples in daijs are [vs]
changed the PoS to [vs,adv]
-----
we usually gloss words leading PoS [vs] as verbs, examples:
	1319000	辞任	じにん	to resign	
	1423060	着手	ちゃくしゅ	to start work (on)	
	1436410	提出	ていしゅつ	to present	
	1453270	同伴	どうはん	to accompany	
	1487250	匹敵	ひってき	to be a match for	
	1559900	連絡	れんらく	to contact	
the following are all common [on-mim] with leading POS [adv]
as you can wee we are completely inconsistent
	1001110	うんざり		tedious	
	1006480	せかせか		restless	
	1226360	びっくり	吃驚	to be surprised
	1011230	ぶらぶら		dangling heavily	
	1124270	ぼやぼや		carelessly	
	1003490	キョロキョロ		looking around restlessly	
but I think we could apply the same rule to them and gloss them as verbs</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -19 +19,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -22,5 +22,5 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;sullen&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;offended&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;petulant&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;indignant&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be sullen&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be offended&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be petulant&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be indignant&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -28,0 +29 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -30 +30,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -32,2 +32,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;stuffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;stifling&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be stuffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be stifling&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-05-31 07:10:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>where is the *%#¤ undo button??
I meant 
"the following are all common [on-mim] with leading POS [vs]"</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-06-01 05:25:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Daijr "（ 副 ） スル", 中辞典 and ルミナス have only むっとする/むっとして examples.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-06-24 04:50:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -33,0 +34 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be muggy&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-04 15:58:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +24,3 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to get angry&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be upset&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be displeased&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-04 22:40:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not sure the extras are needed. Unreferenced additions are best placed at the end.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +24,3 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be petulant&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be indignant&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -27,3 +29,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be petulant&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be indignant&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-06 01:52:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think むうっと comes from an unabridged edition of Nikkoku. I'm not seeing it in my edition (or the one on Kotobank). Given the low counts, I think we can make むーっと and むうっと search-only.
I assume that the unabridged nikk is also the source of the "slowly (exhaling smoke)". I suggest dropping it and replacing it with the "力を入れて，唇をとじるさま" sense in daijr (and nikk).</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, daijr
むっと	71853	34.7%
ムッと	133815	64.6%
むーっと	1044	0.5%
むうっと	471	0.2%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5 +5 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;むっと&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ムッと&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -9 +9 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;ムッと&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;むっと&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;
@@ -18,0 +21 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -21 +24,5 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;むーっと is more emphatic&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be offended&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to get angry&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be annoyed&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be miffed&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -23,5 +29,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be offended&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be huffy&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be petulant&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be indignant&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to get angry&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29 +30,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be displeased&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -32,0 +34 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -40 +41,0 @@
-&lt;stagr&gt;むうっと&lt;/stagr&gt;
@@ -43 +44 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;slowly (exhaling smoke)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;firmly (shutting one's mouth)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-06 10:36:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>