<entry id="2212508" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1548860</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>落雷</keb>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf25</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>spec2</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>らくらい</reb>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf25</re_pri>
<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>lightning strike</gloss>
<gloss>lightning bolt</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-08-13 16:16:10" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>* gloss “lightning strike” – emphasis on *strike*
* split off [vs] sense – verb sense not v. clear from nouns (how do you verb “bolt of lightning”?), and it’s esp. about being struck
(Saw in newspaper yesterday, then heard in conversation today.)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 daijr koj</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,1 +18,1 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;lightning strike&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -22,0 +22,5 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to strike (lightning)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to be struck by lightning&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-08-13 23:32:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-10-30 18:57:36" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>[vi]: meikyo, shinmeikai, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +24 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-10-30 19:38:21" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-01 00:45:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think "lightning strike" as the first gloss renders the second sense unnecessary.
Also, "to be struck with lightning" is misleading as 落雷する doesn't take a subject.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,5 +17,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;lightning strike&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;thunderbolt&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;bolt of lightning&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
@@ -25,2 +20,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to strike (lightning)&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;to be struck by lightning&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;lightning strike&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;lightning bolt&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-11-01 01:00:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>