jmdict
1009030
Active
(id:
2211508)
<entry id="2211508" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1009030</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>どう致しまして</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>如何致しまして</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>どういたしまして</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>∫</pos>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>you're welcome</gloss>
<gloss>don't mention it</gloss>
<gloss>not at all</gloss>
<gloss>my pleasure</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2021-03-02 00:44:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +18 @@
-<gloss>you are welcome</gloss>
+<gloss>you're welcome</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-02 18:49:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>exp, int? どう+いたしまして</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-02 22:48:03" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think we need "exp" on these. We have 600+ "int" entries, many of which are expressions, but only ~20 also have "exp".</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-10-16 05:38:39" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Opencooper</upd_name>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
どう致しまして 7,668 5.3%
如何致しまして 204 0.1%
どういたしまして 136,727 94.6%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-10-16 05:49:11" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>