jmdict
1216470
Active
(id:
2209509)
<entry id="2209509" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1216470</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>丸出し</keb>
<ke_pri>news2</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf35</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>丸だし</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>まる出し</keb>
<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>まるだし</reb>
<re_pri>news2</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf35</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>(fully) exposed</gloss>
<gloss>bare</gloss>
<gloss>uncovered</gloss>
<gloss>in full view</gloss>
<gloss>undisguised</gloss>
<gloss>broad (accent)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2017-08-03 18:35:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -15,0 +16 @@
+<gloss>completely visible</gloss>
@@ -17,0 +19 @@
+<gloss>overt</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-08-03 22:56:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This isn't an adjective so I don't think it should be glossed as one.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>まる出し</keb>
@@ -16,6 +19,5 @@
-<gloss>completely visible</gloss>
-<gloss>bare</gloss>
-<gloss>exposed</gloss>
-<gloss>overt</gloss>
-<gloss>undisguised</gloss>
-<gloss>broad (provincial accent)</gloss>
+<gloss>exposing fully</gloss>
+<gloss>uncovering completely</gloss>
+<gloss>being in full view</gloss>
+<gloss>putting on display</gloss>
+<gloss>not disguising</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-12-03 08:16:26" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Opencooper</upd_name>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
丸出し 685109
丸だし 18627
まる出し 8262
まるだし 70398</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,0 +8,3 @@
+</k_ele>
+<k_ele>
+<keb>丸だし</keb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-12-03 17:20:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-28 02:51:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>"Fully exposed" is a much better way to describe the word than "exposing fully" as this is less natural and sounds a little awkward.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>exposing fully</gloss>
+<gloss>fully exposed</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-28 06:04:51" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Except it's a noun, and you just changed the gloss to an adjective. See the 2017 comments.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22 +22 @@
-<gloss>fully exposed</gloss>
+<gloss>exposing fully</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-23 03:15:27" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>This is to make it easier to find since "expose"/"exposed" is used more in search than "exposing".</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -22,0 +23 @@
+<gloss>fully exposed</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-23 16:52:55" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We try not to mix noun and adjectives glosses in the same sense.
Looking at example sentences, I think it's probably best to make this adj-no and ditch the noun glosses.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, prog, luminous
丸出し 685109 96.2%
丸だし 18627 2.6%
まる出し 8262 1.2%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -10,0 +11 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -13,0 +15 @@
+<ke_inf>&sK;</ke_inf>
@@ -20,0 +23 @@
+<pos>&adj-no;</pos>
@@ -22,6 +25,6 @@
-<gloss>exposing fully</gloss>
-<gloss>fully exposed</gloss>
-<gloss>uncovering completely</gloss>
-<gloss>being in full view</gloss>
-<gloss>putting on display</gloss>
-<gloss>not disguising</gloss>
+<gloss>(fully) exposed</gloss>
+<gloss>bare</gloss>
+<gloss>uncovered</gloss>
+<gloss>in full view</gloss>
+<gloss>undisguised</gloss>
+<gloss>broad (accent)</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>