<entry id="2208770" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2784980</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>アプレ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1018250">アプレゲール</xref>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<gloss>post-war</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-04-30 19:52:07" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-05-01 00:36:26" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-15 05:30:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Opencooper</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Align. As Marcus said on the x-ref, "'après-guerre' does not seem commonly used in English".</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11 +11 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;après-guerre&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;post-war&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-15 06:56:08" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree; not that common, but not a problem with it being in the glosses.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;après-guerre&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-16 23:21:32" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We dropped it as a gloss on アプレゲール. I don't see a need for it here. I'm not seeing it in any English dictionaries.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +11,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;après-guerre&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-17 00:20:08" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Harmless. I don't mind it being there as it helps a user see the source.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>