<entry id="2208596" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2647640</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>猿公</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>えてこう</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1578630">公・4</xref>
<misc>&fam;</misc>
<gloss>monkey</gloss>
<gloss>ape</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-07-16 02:13:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_refs>daij</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-07-16 02:23:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm putting GG5's version first, but all the 国語s say "猿を擬人化した言い方" or equivalent.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,6 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mr. Monkey (addressing a monkey as a human)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;monkey&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;ape&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;personification of a monkey (e.g. Mr. Monkey)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-07-16 05:43:57" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>could be a single sense with a note</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-07 22:08:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,6 +12,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;monkey&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;ape&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;personification of a monkey (e.g. Mr. Monkey)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Mr. Monkey&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Mr. Ape&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-10 07:37:44" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Should this really be a single sense? And if "Mr. Monkey; Mr. Ape" stay, shouldn't there be some note? Solo they look like characters in a kid's book.
(I preferred it the way it was.)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5: 	a monkey; an ape.</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-10 07:48:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I definitely think it's one sense but I don't have any strong feelings as to whether we make it "Mr. Monkey" or just "monkey" (with a note)</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-13 05:52:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Does this work? Could have "monkey (personification, i.e. Mr Monkey, etc.)" rather than a note.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,2 +12,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mr. Monkey&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;Mr. Ape&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;personification, i.e. Mr Monkey, etc.&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;monkey&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;ape&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-14 23:32:36" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'd go with this.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12,2 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;personification, i.e. Mr Monkey, etc.&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1578630"&gt;公・4&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;fam;&lt;/misc&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-15 00:41:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I guess so.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>