jmdict
2762810
Active
(id:
2208139)
<entry id="2208139" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2762810</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>然うしたら</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>そうしたら</reb>
<re_pri>spec2</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&conj;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2856217">そしたら</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<gloss>then</gloss>
<gloss>and (then)</gloss>
<gloss>in that case</gloss>
<gloss>if so</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-01-08 02:07:34" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>winnie</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>http://ejje.weblio.jp/content/%E3%81%9D%E3%81%86%E3%81%97%E3%81%9F%E3%82%89
http://ejje.weblio.jp/sentence/content/%E3%81%9D%E3%81%86%E3%81%97%E3%81%9F%E3%82%89
http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?p=%E3%81%9D%E3%81%86%E3%81%97%E3%81%9F%E3%82%89&enc=UTF-8&stype=0&dtype=3</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-01-08 06:50:22" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-03-15 22:45:28" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>I propose merging in そしたら. Just a slightly different spelling.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>そしたら</reb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-03-15 22:50:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Also, exp? daijs has conj (and 然うしたら as a kanji which might preempt the merge...)</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<k_ele>
+<keb>然うしたら</keb>
+</k_ele>
@@ -11 +14,2 @@
-<pos>&exp;</pos>
+<pos>&conj;</pos>
+<xref type="see" seq="1406070">それなら</xref>
@@ -16,0 +21 @@
+<gloss>if that's the case</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-03-15 22:56:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Scott</upd_name>
<upd_detl>Sorry for the edits. I don't know if you want to merge, but if you do, it's now more consistent.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12 @@
+<re_nokanji/>
@@ -15,0 +17 @@
+<misc>&uk;</misc></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2016-03-16 05:32:26" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>然うしたら is so rare it's hardly worth keeping.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-06 06:46:25" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>然うしたら 35
そうしたら 775258
そしたら 3347699</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6 @@
+<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-01 01:17:05" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,0 +14 @@
+<re_pri>spec1</re_pri></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-01 03:45:26" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+<re_pri>spec2</re_pri></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-06 10:47:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Keita Miwa</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>「そしたら」should be [ik] because "う" in the original word is ignored.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-06 11:47:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's not really "ik" as such. Best to revert that merge and have it stand alone.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,6 +10,0 @@
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>そしたら</reb>
-<re_nokanji/>
-<re_inf>&ik;</re_inf>
-<re_pri>spec1</re_pri></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-08 06:45:19" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+<xref type="see" seq="2856217">そしたら</xref></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-09 21:26:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think "because then" works very well.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, daijs</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -14 +13,0 @@
-<xref type="see" seq="1406070">それなら</xref>
@@ -18,2 +17,2 @@
-<gloss>and then</gloss>
-<gloss>and</gloss>
+<gloss>and (then)</gloss>
+<gloss>in that case</gloss>
@@ -21,2 +19,0 @@
-<gloss>because then</gloss>
-<gloss>if that's the case</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-10 03:57:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>