<entry id="2207905" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1021750</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>イメージ</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>image (in one's mind)</gloss>
<gloss>impression</gloss>
<gloss>imagining</gloss>
<gloss>mental image</gloss>
<gloss>(forming a) mental picture</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<field>&comp;</field>
<gloss>(computer) image</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>depiction (e.g. of a product)</gloss>
<gloss>rendition</gloss>
<gloss>impression</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-12-06 11:46:31" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Add “mental image” gloss.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -27,0 +27,2 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;mental image&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;impression&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-12-07 00:57:10" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-29 04:07:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think there's a lot of overlap between daijr' sense 1 
and 2, to the extent I can't come up with anything that 
distinguishes the usage in these examples:
example sense 1: 「インドは暑い国という－がある」
example sense 2: 「 －していたものと実際は全く違った」
_
I don't understand daijr's sense 3:
③  〘心〙 目の前にない対象を直観的・具体的に思い描いた像。 
「視覚的－」
There's a sentence including "視覚的イメージ" in EDR日英対
訳辞書 where it's translated as "visual image." Not 
immediately helpful.
_
I think you could make an argument for having a separate 
"reputation" sense: daijs 「企業イメージを高める」, prog: 
"これは我が党のイメージアップになる" but I think that's also 
sort of contained in the current sense 1.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs 1 sense
daijr 3
chujiten 1
prog 2</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +17,4 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;impression&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;mental image&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(mental) picture&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;view&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -20 +23,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -24,7 +26,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;mental image&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;impression&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;artist's impression&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-29 05:09:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not finding any evidence for イメジ either</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,3 +7,0 @@
-&lt;/r_ele&gt;
-&lt;r_ele&gt;
-&lt;reb&gt;イメジ&lt;/reb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-01-29 08:33:40" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-12 07:16:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>In commercials showing food products, there's always a bit at the bottom: *(写真は）イメージです"
i.e. "actual product may differ from image shown" (or "actual circumstances of the animals producing this milk may differ 
from image shown" in the example shown above)
I think this should be an additional sense because mashing this into sense 1 would make things confusing.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://www.excite.co.jp/news/article/E1496307667655/</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-12 08:07:04" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Would this do? (I agree, it would overload sense 1).</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +24,5 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;depiction (e.g. of a product)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;impression&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-13 00:01:56" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;rendition&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-13 05:07:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>this xref doesn't make sense to me.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,2 +11,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1021760"&gt;イメージアップ&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1021760"&gt;イメージアップ&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-13 15:15:19" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think "(one's) image" is a helpful gloss. I think we can drop "view".</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr, gg5</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;(one's) image&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;image (in one's mind)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -16 +15,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;view&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-09-13 21:16:00" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-07 13:58:30" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_refs>明鏡</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -11,0 +12,2 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vt;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-07 13:59:24" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_detl>vs should maybe be split out as "imagining" - doesn't really follow from the noun glosses. "to image" X "to impress" X</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-08 07:03:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It's all in sense 1 - I think it's better to extend the glosses a little.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -14,0 +15 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;imagining&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -16 +17 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;(mental) picture&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(forming a) mental picture&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>