JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 2824350 Active (id: 2207902)
<entry id="2207902" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2824350</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>かも知んない</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かもしんない</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>かもしない</reb>
<re_inf>&sk;</re_inf>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1002970">かもしれない</xref>
<misc>&uk;</misc>
<misc>&col;</misc>
<gloss>may</gloss>
<gloss>might</gloss>
<gloss>perhaps</gloss>
<gloss>may be</gloss>
<gloss>possibly</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2014-09-25 04:45:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>dunno if this really should be a separate entry from かもしれ
ない but the kanji don't match, so...</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ngrams
かもしない	9314
かもしんない	330813</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-09-25 08:45:24" stat="A" unap="true">
</audit>
<audit time="2014-10-01 23:20:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Merge would be messy.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>かも知ない	124
かも知んない	21345</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;かも知んない&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -8,0 +12 @@
+&lt;re_nokanji/&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-06 10:44:17" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Keita Miwa</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>「かもしない」should be [ik] because "ん" in the original word is ignored.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-06 11:32:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-06 12:20:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This is a col abbr of かもしれない. I don't see  good case for marking the slightly shorter form as ik. Not that common though, so sk might make sense?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -13 +12,0 @@
-&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;ik;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-07 20:53:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think [nokanji] should be used for forms like this. I'd make it a separate col entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>かもしない	9314</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-07 21:18:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think it'd be excessive to split it out considering how similar they are. We wouldn't normally use nokanji like this, true enough, but I think I'd prefer to make it sk over splitting it out?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>かもしない	9314	2.7%
かもしんない	330813	97.3%</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;re_nokanji/&gt;
+&lt;re_inf&gt;&amp;sk;&lt;/re_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-09-08 06:47:12" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm comfortable with that.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml