<entry id="2204763" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1254690</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>結果</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf01</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>けっか</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf01</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>result</gloss>
<gloss>consequence</gloss>
<gloss>outcome</gloss>
<gloss>effect</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<gloss>as a result of ...</gloss>
<gloss>as a consequence of ...</gloss>
<gloss>after ...</gloss>
<gloss>following ...</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>bearing fruit</gloss>
<gloss>fruiting</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-06-15 02:09:34" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>sense 1 could be split into two in accordance with daijr's note on it sometimes (but not always) specifically being about a good result(成果)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>sense 3: ④ (前文をうけて副詞的に用いる) 結局。つまり。
※男の遠吠え（1974‐75）〈藤本義一〉女にはなぜ作曲家がいない？「女のものの考え方について非作曲家的なところを考えてみた。結果、女の考え方というのは、１＋１
は２であるということだ」(nikk)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,2 +17,2 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-t;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -29,0 +30,6 @@
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;as a result&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;consequently&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;therefore&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-06-15 06:54:07" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>381 Tanaka sentences using 結果 of which 81 have 結果に, but none seem to be sense 3.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-03-31 04:33:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Bulk update n-adv to n,adv
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -31 +31,2 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-17 03:08:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>meikyo</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18 +17,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -26,0 +26 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-17 06:53:37" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-17 14:39:40" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think the "bearing fruit" sense should go last.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>gg5, chujiten, daij, meikyo</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +24,7 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;as a result of ...&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;as a consequence of ...&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;after ...&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;following ...&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
@@ -27 +33,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;coming to fruition&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29,7 +35 @@
-&lt;/sense&gt;
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adv;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;as a result&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;consequently&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;therefore&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;fruiting&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-18 12:12:03" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I've reindexed a sentence.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>