<entry id="2204537" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1385060</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>切実に</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>せつじつに</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adv;</pos>
<gloss>strongly</gloss>
<gloss>keenly</gloss>
<gloss>vividly</gloss>
<gloss>sincerely</gloss>
<gloss>urgently</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-07-04 12:13:54" stat="D" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We used to sometimes include very plain and simple adj-na+に before based on them being in GG5, but I don't think we should and that we should get rid of the ones we have. GG5 has basically all common adj-na as "...に" as well, but I don't think we want to copy that.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-04 21:20:16" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We probably wouldn't add them now, and I wouldn't suggest 切実さ which is also in GG5, but there's no reason to cull them. They're not exactly wasting paper.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-05 06:25:50" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I disagree - I think there's a value in being consistent, it makes the dictionary easier to use and interpret. It requires no big effort to remove them.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-17 07:51:33" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Re: "makes the dictionary easier to use and interpret"; I'm not sure having the --に version of a な adjective entry is any problem at all when it comes to use. That said, this one is a bit odd as our 切実 entry has two senses and this has them rolled together. It probably should be aligned, but I agree it could equally well go.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>