<entry id="2204172" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1582990</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>剥ぐ</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>剝ぐ</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<k_ele>
<keb>折ぐ</keb>
<ke_inf>&rK;</ke_inf>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>はぐ</reb>
<re_restr>剥ぐ</re_restr>
<re_restr>剝ぐ</re_restr>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>へぐ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&v5g;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>to tear off</gloss>
<gloss>to peel off</gloss>
<gloss>to rip off</gloss>
<gloss>to strip off</gloss>
<gloss>to skin</gloss>
<gloss>to flay</gloss>
<gloss>to bark</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<stagr>はぐ</stagr>
<pos>&v5g;</pos>
<pos>&vt;</pos>
<gloss>to strip of (clothes, rank, etc.)</gloss>
<gloss>to deprive of</gloss>
<gloss>to divest of</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-01-07 23:12:41" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>see rejected 2675210, which suggested the addition of 剝ぐ (an itaiji of 剥ぐ).  i'm pretty sure that edict can't handle this kanji, but adding it here for confirmation by Jim.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>koj, daij for 折ぐ.  all dics for sense splitting</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;折ぐ&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -10,0 +13,1 @@
+&lt;re_restr&gt;剥ぐ&lt;/re_restr&gt;
@@ -17,0 +21,1 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vt;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -23,0 +28,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to bark&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -24,0 +30,4 @@
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;v5g;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vt;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -25,0 +35,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to divest&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-01-07 23:13:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -32,0 +32,1 @@
+&lt;stagr&gt;はぐ&lt;/stagr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-01-08 11:02:04" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-12 15:05:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Nils Roland Barth</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>more detail on secondary “strip of, deprive of” sense</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5 daijr koj</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -35,0 +35,1 @@
+&lt;gloss&gt;to strip of (e.g. clothes, rank)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-09-16 03:59:05" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2017-08-22 19:49:43" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -29 +28,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to disrobe&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -35 +34 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to strip of (e.g. clothes, rank)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to strip of (clothes, rank, etc.)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -37 +36 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;to divest&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;to divest of&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-06-27 13:18:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>tjdtg</upd_name>
<upd_refs>https://kotobank.jp/word/%E5%89%A5%E3%81%90%E3%83%BB%E5%89%9D%E3%81%90-357218</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +7,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;剝ぐ&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2019-06-28 05:44:39" stat="A">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-11-13 05:39:22" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>剥ぐ	42083
剝ぐ	No matches
折ぐ	No matches</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -9,0 +10 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
@@ -12,0 +14 @@
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-15 20:30:54" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Peter Maydell</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think the intention was to forbid the はぐ reading for 折ぐ, but currently it is also forbidden for 剝ぐ, which means automated parsers using JMDict will assume that 剝ぐ must be read as へぐ.

AIUI 剥 and 剝 are essentially two variants of the same kanji and the はぐ reading is OK for both.

The entry for 剥がす/剝がす does not have an equivalent restriction, incidentally.

PS I think I have the reading field syntax right, but please check it...</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijisen allows は・ぐ【剝ぐ】
https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E5%89%9D%E3%81%90_%28%E3%81%AF%E3%81%90%29/#jn-175004</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+&lt;re_restr&gt;剝ぐ&lt;/re_restr&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-08-15 23:19:42" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I agree. When 剝ぐ was added it should have been included in the はぐ reading group.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>