<entry id="2198059" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1630190</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>共和</keb>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf03</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>きょうわ</reb>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf03</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1235350">共和制</xref>
<gloss>republicanism</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>cooperation</gloss>
<gloss>working together</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2011-08-17 03:24:46" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I can't find this being used other than prenominally.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>GG5, etc.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;republicanism&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;cooperation&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-f;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;republican&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;cooperative&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2011-08-17 08:05:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-21 17:23:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Make changes or leave this entry the way it is?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijs:  [n,vs]
meikyo: [n,vs,vi]

Google N-gram Corpus Counts
╭─ーーーー─┬───────────┬────────╮
│ 共和　　 │ 1,496,276 │ 100.0% │
│ 共和が　 │       447 │   0.0% │
│ 共和する │        54 │   0.0% │
│ 共和し　 │        46 │   0.0% │
╰─ーーーー─┴───────────┴────────╯</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-22 02:00:57" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>The JEs only have prenominal examples. A good example of the disconnect one often sees between the kokugos and modern usage.
Maybe this works.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18,8 @@
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vs;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;orig. meaning&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;cooperation&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;working togetjer&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-22 11:54:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>If 共和 was invented as a translation for the Dutch word "republik" in 1845 (daijr), I don't think "orig. meaning" works on sense 2.
I wouldn't mind having "republicanism" on sense 1 as an n. I don't think it's a "true adjective" because it's only used like that in a couple of set words/熟語.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-22 19:53:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'd go with this.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>koj: ①［史記周本紀］二人以上が共同和合して政務などをすること。
     ②政治社会が構成員全体のものであり、その共同利益のために存在すると見なす考え方。
nikk: １ (―する)二人以上の者が共同して仲よく事業や政務などを行なうこと。
      ２ ＝きょうわせい(共和制)</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -15,3 +15,3 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;adj-f;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;republican&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;cooperative&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1235350"&gt;共和制&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;republicanism&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -23 +22,0 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;orig. meaning&lt;/s_inf&gt;
@@ -25 +24 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;working togetjer&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;working together&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-22 21:11:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I still think it would be better with adj-f as well.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>共和	1496227	  
共和国	1241939	  
共和党	195194	  
共和制	68972</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-23 01:43:18" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Like Marcus, I don't believe it's truly adjectival. It appears in a handful of compounds but it can't be placed in front of any noun to mean "republican".</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>