jmdict
2141690
Active
(id:
2195968)
<entry id="2195968" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2141690</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ふざけんな</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<misc>&col;</misc>
<gloss>stop messing around!</gloss>
<gloss>get real!</gloss>
<gloss>stop screwing around!</gloss>
<gloss>screw you!</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2007-03-28 00:00:00" stat="A">
<upd_detl>Entry created</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-03 01:45:48" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>Eijiro, Ngrams.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,9 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふざけんじゃねーよ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふざけんじゃねえぞ</reb>
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふざけんじゃないぞ</reb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-06 05:06:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-07 07:03:52" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_detl>should this maybe be trimmed down to just ふざけんな?
ngrams
ふざけんなよ 36228
ふざけんな 165068</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-05-09 23:29:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I overlooked ふざけんな.
I'm inclined to be inclusive for this collection. They're harmless swept into the one entry, and it sure helps text glossing.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,3 @@
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふざけんな</reb>
+</r_ele></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-24 14:37:38" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think it's really appropriate to keep this many different forms in the same entry. I think it's confusing, it's not how we usually do things.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://eitopi.com/fuzakeruna-eigo</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,12 +6,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふざけんなよ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふざけんじゃねーよ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふざけんじゃねえぞ</reb>
-</r_ele>
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふざけんじゃないぞ</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -22,3 +10,4 @@
-<gloss>stop bullshitting me</gloss>
-<gloss>you're fucking kidding me</gloss>
-<gloss>you're full of shit</gloss>
+<gloss>stop messing around!</gloss>
+<gloss>get real!</gloss>
+<gloss>stop screwing around!</gloss>
+<gloss>screw you!</gloss></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-24 20:26:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>How about this. It will match the two main versions.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ふざけんな 165068
ふざけんなよ 36228
ふざけんじゃねーよ 2822
ふざけんじゃねえぞ 806
ふざけんじゃないぞ 102
ふざけんじゃね 3074</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -5,0 +6,3 @@
+</r_ele>
+<r_ele>
+<reb>ふざけんじゃね</reb></upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-15 05:59:35" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'll split out ふざけんじゃね. I don't think expressions that contain different words (imperative な vs じゃね) should be in the same entry.
(But I don't actually think it needs to be an entry)
vulg is prob not really correct. offensive, yes, but vulgar?</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -7,3 +6,0 @@
-<r_ele>
-<reb>ふざけんじゃね</reb>
-</r_ele>
@@ -12 +9 @@
-<misc>&vulg;</misc>
+<misc>&col;</misc></upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>