<entry id="2195185" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1058720</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>サンフランシスコ</reb>
<re_pri>gai1</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>サン・フランシスコ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>San Francisco</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-05-11 08:01:52" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.Added additional dotted reading(s) via batch update.
-*- via bulkupd.py -*-</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -8,0 +8,3 @@
+&lt;r_ele&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;サン・フランシスコ&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;/r_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-12-13 20:33:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>see comments on 2826285</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr, daijs</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,0 +13 @@
+&lt;s_inf&gt;also written as 桑港&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2014-12-13 21:50:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-30 20:08:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>See ロンドン, パリ, ニューヨーク, etc.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -3,0 +4,5 @@
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;桑港&lt;/keb&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ateji;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
@@ -13 +17,0 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;also written as 桑港&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-30 20:14:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Then again, it's not ateji in the strict sense. Maybe better to add サンフランシスコ as a gikun reading to 桑港/そうこう?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-10 04:33:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I don't think it's an ateji (桑港 derived from 桑方西斯哥 + 港) and I don't think it's a gikun reading either. I really think it was best the way it was as two entries.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-10 10:58:06" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>If it's not ateji, it's gikun. It can't be neither.
I wasn't proposing that we delete this entry. By adding サンフランシスコ to 桑港/そうこう, we could drop any mention of 桑港 from this entry. 桑港 is more or less obsolete, no matter how it's read.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-07-10 11:59:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Yes, we thrashed that around with 麦酒/ビール some years ago. I've never been comfortable with loanwords (and names) being called gikun but I can live with it.
I've fiddled the 桑港 entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -4,5 +3,0 @@
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;桑港&lt;/keb&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;ateji;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
-&lt;ke_inf&gt;&amp;rK;&lt;/ke_inf&gt;
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>