<entry id="2192016" stat="D" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2855205</ent_seq>
<r_ele>
<reb>ピンクカラー</reb>
</r_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ピンク・カラー</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>pink colour</gloss>
<gloss>pink color</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-06-20 05:50:51" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Marcus deleted this sense from 1107150 on the grounds of the collar/colour etymology difference. I think it's important this sense remains in an entry. My preference would be for it to continue in 1107150.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Reverso: 10 of the 11 matches are for pink color
WWW: most hits are for things colored pink.
https://lalahair.co.jp/magazine/hair/color/self-pink/ - "美容師が選ぶ市販の___ピンクカラー___のおすすめ人気ランキングを紹介します。"</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-20 05:54:00" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I'm not really convinced this needs to be an entry.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>ブラックカラー	48633
ピンクカラー	32323	
オレンジカラー	21528
グリーンカラー	17419	
イエローカラー	13181
レッドカラー	19614</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-20 05:55:25" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I also don't think we should side-step our "split-on-etymology" policy on this.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-20 07:46:21" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I certainly don't think we need entries for レッドカラー, オレンジカラー, etc. as they are quite unambiguous. ピンクカラー is an exception, thanks to the カラー being in three different entries. I think we owe it to users not to give a single quite misleading gloss if they look up the katakana I quoted.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-20 14:03:37" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>But how likely is it someone would actually look up the meaning of the two words ピンクカラー together when looking at them in a context when it's a reference to pink color rather than pink collar? I have a hard time imagining an actual scenario where having this entry ends up helping anyone.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-21 07:23:33" stat="D">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Glossing systems tend to go for the longest match, and since there are thousands of gloss requests each day I don't want to send them to the wrong entries.
That said, I see I have glossing problems with other XXカラー terms, e.g. ブラックカラー is bringing up the "black calla" lily. Since I have to do some XXカラー fixes I may as well handle ピンクカラー at the same time.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>