JMdictDB - Japanese Dictionary Database

Entries

Search | Advanced Search | New Entry | Submissions | Help
Login for registered editors
Username:
Password:
jmdict 1296560 Active (id: 2191657)
<entry id="2191657" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1296560</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>在日</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf04</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ざいにち</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf04</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&adj-f;</pos>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&vs;</pos>
<pos>&vi;</pos>
<gloss>resident in Japan (of a foreigner)</gloss>
<gloss>situated in Japan (e.g. of an embassy)</gloss>
</sense>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="2275640">在日韓国人</xref>
<xref type="see" seq="2727090">在日朝鮮人</xref>
<misc>&abbr;</misc>
<misc>&sens;</misc>
<gloss>Zainichi</gloss>
<gloss>Zainichi Korean</gloss>
<gloss g_type="expl">North or South Korean national with permanent residency in Japan (who came to the country before 1945, or a descendant of such a person)</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-06-27 12:05:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus</upd_name>
<upd_refs>"しばしば「在日」と短縮して用いられる"
"「在日」とだけ表現する場合は在日外国人一般ではなく、在日韓国・朝鮮人(それもニ
ューカマーを含まない特別永住者)を指すことが大半である。"
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9C%A8%E6%97%A5%E9%9F%93%E5%9B
%BD%E3%83%BB%E6%9C%9D%E9%AE%AE%E4%BA%BA
http://www.toyo-keizai.co.jp/news/essay/2009/post_2732.php</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,1 +23,9 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;people in Japan (esp. Koreans living in Japan, often used as a slur)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;abbr;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;sens;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;s_inf&gt;short for 在日韓国人 or 在日朝鮮人&lt;/s_inf&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Korean living in Japan&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;/sense&gt;
+&lt;sense&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-pref;&lt;/pos&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;(foreign) person living or staying in Japan&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-06-30 01:14:07" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Let's make them xrefs.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -23,0 +23,3 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2275640"&gt;在日韓国人&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2275640"&gt;在日韓国人&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2727090"&gt;在日朝鮮人&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -25,1 +28,0 @@
-&lt;s_inf&gt;short for 在日韓国人 or 在日朝鮮人&lt;/s_inf&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-26 20:02:47" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Always a foreigner. Don't need more than two senses.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>daijr: "外国人が,日本にいる"
daijs: "外国人が日本に滞在、または居住していること"
koj: "外国から来て日本に在住・滞在していること"</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -19 +19,2 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;in Japan&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;resident in Japan (of a foreigner)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;situated in Japan (e.g. of an embassy)&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -29,5 +29,0 @@
-&lt;sense&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n-pref;&lt;/pos&gt;
-&lt;gloss&gt;(foreign) person living or staying in Japan&lt;/gloss&gt;
-&lt;/sense&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2018-03-27 01:36:59" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-01 03:32:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Not used in the same way of Koreans who aren't 
特別永住者, I don t think</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -28 +28,3 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Korean living in Japan&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Zainichi&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;Zainichi Korean&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean national that has lived in Japan since before the end of WWII (or is a descendent of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-01 23:45:48" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-11 18:45:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_diff>@@ -30 +30 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean national that has lived in Japan since before the end of WWII (or is a descendent of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean national that has lived in Japan since before the end of WWII (or is a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-11 21:25:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2021-12-12 11:33:28" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -30 +30 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean national that has lived in Japan since before the end of WWII (or is a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean national who has lived in Japan since before the end of WWII (or is a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-13 22:47:36" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>As Korea isn't a single country, I don't think we should use "national".</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -17,0 +18 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -18,0 +20 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;vi;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -30 +32 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean national who has lived in Japan since before the end of WWII (or is a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean person with permanent residency in Japan (who came to the country before 1945, or a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-14 00:58:11" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>but "Korean" plays the same role in "Korean person" as in "Korean national" - if it can refer to both Koreas in "... person", can't it in "... national" too? I feel the citizenship part is very important. This is often the only way these people really are Korean - by citizenship. Linguistically, culturally, they're often entirely Japanese. Some are not even fully ethnically Korean but half-Japanese but still "Zainichi Korean" by virtue of their passport.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -27 +26,0 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="2727090"&gt;在日朝鮮人&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-19 21:54:42" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>"Korean people" can refer to Koreans as an ethnic group. I felt it was a more accurate term in this context. But if it's important to mention citizenship, I think this is better.
I don't think the 在日朝鮮人 x-ref should have been dropped. North Korean "Zainichi" are not 在日韓国人.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -26,0 +27 @@
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="2727090"&gt;在日朝鮮人&lt;/xref&gt;
@@ -31 +32 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;Korean person with permanent residency in Japan (who came to the country before 1945, or a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;North Korean or South Korean national with permanent residency in Japan (who came to the country before 1945, or a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-06-20 00:36:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_diff>@@ -32 +32 @@
-&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;North Korean or South Korean national with permanent residency in Japan (who came to the country before 1945, or a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss g_type="expl"&gt;North or South Korean national with permanent residency in Japan (who came to the country before 1945, or a descendant of such a person)&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>



View entry in alternate formats: jel | edict | jmdict xml | jmnedict xml | jmdictdb xml