<entry id="2188075" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2854672</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>リスクが高い</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>リスクがたかい</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&exp;</pos>
<pos>&adj-i;</pos>
<gloss>(very) risky</gloss>
<gloss>high-risk</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-05-21 02:06:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>worth having?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>リスクの高い	55480
リスクが高い	1119698</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-22 15:16:20" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>As it's literal and obvious, I'd say no. It's not a difficult construction for someone to come up with themselves.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-22 16:16:29" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>I was once corrected by a native speaker because I said 根気が高い
rather than 根気がある, so maybe there's some value to collecting
expressions like this. (Unless there's a consistent rule as to
when you can use 高い?)</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-22 22:26:51" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Probably 高い should only be used when the subject can be a matter of degree.
I'd accept this one. I'll approve and reopen.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>根気が高い	0
根気がある	5111
リスクが高い	1119698
リスクがある	231906
リスクが低い	14928
リスクの低い	17989
リスクの少ない	24435</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-22 22:27:13" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-29 03:46:46" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Quiet</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>