<entry id="2185007" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2854402</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>光入力</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ひかりにゅうりょく</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>optical input</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2022-04-29 15:17:55" stat="A" unap="true">
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-30 05:52:54" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Very much 光 + 入力, but probably common enough. As a prefix meaning "optical" the reading is almost always ひかり. When searching for ひかりにゅうりょく, Google suggests 光入力. MeCab/Unidic agrees.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>光入力	5390</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -8 +8 @@
-&lt;reb&gt;こうにゅうりょく&lt;/reb&gt;
+&lt;reb&gt;ひかりにゅうりょく&lt;/reb&gt;
@@ -12 +12 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;Optical input&lt;/gloss&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;optical input&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-30 13:54:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Is this really correct? Most of the hits I get for 光入力 (when searching on google without quote marks) are false positives</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-01 05:48:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Which is why I never use Google with Japanese search terms without quotes. There is a clear mismatch between the n-grams and the Google returns, but the KM n-grams, which use better parsing, are similar. I don't know what's happening but there are enough real hits for me to accept it.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://bbs.kakaku.com/bbs/K0000880971/SortID=21334036/
https://discussionsjapan.apple.com/thread/252724441</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-05-01 08:24:19" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I find that words that don't get real hits on Google without quotation marks are usually not real words. (and if they have high hits in the ngrams it'll be from misparsing)</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>eij does have "光入力 optical input"</upd_refs>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>