<entry id="2184387" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2756630</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>疎覚え</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>おろおぼえ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<xref type="see" seq="1676030">うろ覚え</xref>
<misc>&arch;</misc>
<gloss>faint memory</gloss>
<gloss>vague recollection</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2012-11-07 22:34:23" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Splitting from 1676030 - reading is different.</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>Daijr</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2012-11-08 07:11:53" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>daijs</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -13,2 +13,2 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ憶え・そらおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ憶え・そらおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・そらおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・そらおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-06-21 07:12:49" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>midori</upd_name>
<upd_refs>The reb そらおぼえ doesn't apply to the keb うろ覚え; only the reb うろおぼえ 
does.</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・そらおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・うろおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-06-21 11:46:45" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I have contacted Stuart McGraw about this. It seems like a bug. Don't approve the change yet.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-06-22 02:13:06" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>It seems these have to be set by hand - I'd assumed that the xref target would honour the restrictions, but the default is the get the first kanji and first reading.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -12,1 +12,1 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・うろおぼえ・2&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・うろおぼえ・1&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-21 00:20:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>This was split out from うろ覚え (in 2012) because the kokugos only have おろおぼえ as a reading for 疎覚え, but several online sources state that 疎覚え is the kanji for うろおぼえ (without mentioning おろおぼえ at all).
Judging from the examples in the kokugos, おろおぼえ is archaic, while 疎覚え remains only as an obscure, non-standard kanji form of うろおぼえ. Should we add 疎覚え back to the うろ覚え entry as an iK form?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>https://docoic.com/54187
"「うろおぼえ」は漢字で「疎覚え」と書きます。"
https://www.kanjipedia.jp/kotoba/0004180600
"疎覚え  うろおぼえ"
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%81%86%E3%82%8D%E8%A6%9A%E3%81%88
"うろ覚え（うろおぼえ、疎覚え、空覚え）
----
疎覚え	357
おろ覚え	45
うろ覚え	410633</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -12 +12,3 @@
-&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え・うろおぼえ&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;xref type="see" seq="1676030"&gt;うろ覚え&lt;/xref&gt;
+&lt;misc&gt;&amp;arch;&lt;/misc&gt;
+&lt;gloss&gt;faint memory&lt;/gloss&gt;
@@ -14 +15,0 @@
-&lt;gloss&gt;faint memory&lt;/gloss&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-26 08:25:20" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>May as well. I'll do it.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>