<entry id="2182823" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>1494860</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>不便</keb>
<ke_pri>ichi1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>news1</ke_pri>
<ke_pri>nf22</ke_pri>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>ふべん</reb>
<re_pri>ichi1</re_pri>
<re_pri>news1</re_pri>
<re_pri>nf22</re_pri>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<pos>&adj-na;</pos>
<xref type="ant" seq="1512610">便利</xref>
<gloss>inconvenience</gloss>
<gloss>inexpediency</gloss>
<gloss>unhandiness</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2020-08-15 10:21:08" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>johan</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Johan Råde</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>Cannot have [adj-na,n] with noun glosses
Should we change to adj glosses?</upd_detl>
<upd_refs>G n-grams:
不便な	464520	 
不便を	359737	&lt;- [n]  
不便です	201478	
不便だ	179169	
不便さ	118464	
不便に	117129	
不便で	115433</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2020-08-15 13:53:55" stat="A">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>We tend to stick to noun glosses when noun usage is common (as it is here).</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -16,0 +17 @@
+&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;
@@ -18 +18,0 @@
-&lt;pos&gt;&amp;n;&lt;/pos&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-05 01:57:43" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Stephen Kraus</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>shinmeikai 5e, oubunsha kokugo jiten 11e</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -18,0 +19 @@
+&lt;xref type="ant" seq="1512610"&gt;便利&lt;/xref&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-05 06:00:29" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>