<entry id="2182542" stat="A" corpus="jmdict" type="jmdict">
<ent_corp type="jmdict">jmdict</ent_corp>
<ent_seq>2765450</ent_seq>
<k_ele>
<keb>美しさ</keb>
</k_ele>
<r_ele>
<reb>うつくしさ</reb>
</r_ele>
<sense>
<pos>&n;</pos>
<gloss>beauty</gloss>
</sense>
<info>
<audit time="2013-01-23 08:28:53" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>rene</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Rene Malenfant</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>gg5, nikk, prog, nc</upd_refs>
</audit>
<audit time="2013-01-23 14:49:50" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_refs>nikk</upd_refs>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,0 +6,3 @@
+&lt;/k_ele&gt;
+&lt;k_ele&gt;
+&lt;keb&gt;愛しさ&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-03-31 23:27:58" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>robin1354</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Robin Scott</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>愛しさ is read いとしさ 99.99%+ of the time. To avoid false matches, we could add a 愛しさ/いとしさ entry, but given that 愛しい is a very uncommon way of writing うつくしい (the JEs and daijr/s don't even have it), I instead propose dropping 愛しさ from this entry. We'd still have 愛しい on the うつくしい entry.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-01 00:43:17" stat="A">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>I think that is sound.</upd_detl>
<upd_diff>@@ -6,3 +5,0 @@
-&lt;/k_ele&gt;
-&lt;k_ele&gt;
-&lt;keb&gt;愛しさ&lt;/keb&gt;</upd_diff>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-01 02:59:16" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>can't we just tag it [rK] instead?</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-01 04:41:03" stat="A" unap="true">
<upd_uid>jwb</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Jim Breen</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>That would really only work if we had a 愛しさ/いとしさ entry as well.  I could go that way if you want to add that, but having 愛しさ here only, even with an rK tag, would be a bit misleading.</upd_detl>
</audit>
<audit time="2022-04-01 10:14:38" stat="A">
<upd_uid>Marcus</upd_uid>
<upd_name>Marcus Richert</upd_name>
<upd_email>...address hidden...</upd_email>
<upd_detl>OK.</upd_detl>
</audit>
</info>
</entry>